Federalists Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution

Words: 436
Pages: 2
Open Document
One of the many great debates in American history, the ratification of the Constitution. This took place in 1787 through 1788 at the Constitutional Convention. They were two sides to this debate, those who supported the proposed constitution, and those who were against the proposed constitution. Federalists were supporting the Constitution because they thought we needed a stronger national republic and the constitution gave more powers to the central government. Anti federalists were against Constitution because they felt there should be more power for the state governments which is not what the Constitution did. They also claimed that we need a bill of rights to protect the rights for personal beings. The anti federalists have a stronger claim …show more content…
Their reasonings against having it was because they could just give the rest of the powers that were not given to the states or the federal government would be given to the people and the state governments in which there would not be any reason to have the Bill of
Rights. This was all to counteract the anti federalists arguments.
However, the anti federalists’ claim in which that we need a Bill of Rights is because They said giving too much power to the central government would threaten the authority of the states.
Other federalists argued that the way the Constitution was written would make
There are many other strong claims that the antifederalists had. They said that we need a Bill of
Rights because without it, the individuals would not have as many rights and it will protect them more than the constitution did. The anti federalists made it so the Constitution could not be ratified unless it had the Bill of Rights in it.
Besides that, Other federalists had different reasons to oppose the Constitution. They argued that the way the Constitution was written would make it that having so a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the powers and cruelty Great Britain’s government had.
Show More

Related Documents: Federalists Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution

Arguments and Opposition to the Constitution Essays

following question: What were the major arguments that surfaced in opposition to the new Constitution proposed in 1787? How did supporters of the Constitution counter those arguments? Previous attempts to change the Articles of Confederation had failed because the approval of every state was required. There was often one or more recalcitrant member of the union. For example, Rhode Island even refused to take part in the framing; opposition to a new constitution was certainly formidable. Consequently…

Words 978 - Pages 4

Federalist Papers Pros And Cons

The Federalist Papers are without doubt, one of the most important historical documents in American history. While the original intent was to encourage the ratification of the Constitution in the state of New York, today they show political history, and are used by modern-day scholars and Supreme Court Justices to interpret the Constitution. The Federalist Papers continue to be important and significant because they provide insight on the political practices during the Constitutional debates, aid…

Words 752 - Pages 4

The Federalist Papers

The Federalist papers are comprised of 85 articles written during the late 1780’s by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the communal pseudonym Publius, in honor of Publius Valerius Publicola for being a key factor in the creation of the Roman Republic. These founders Fathers hoped to, and eventually would succeed in being a similar factor for political reform in America. ("The Federalist Papers.") These articles have arguably become some of America's most politically formative…

Words 1411 - Pages 6

Anti Federalist Despotism

The establishment of the United States constitution was conveyed by long term debate regarding the Country future and its’s edification. These heated arguments brought about the formation of two political parties, the federalists and antifederalists. Antifederalists was knowing as the opposing party where their debates addresses the supremacy of the federalist’s interest over its citizen. “The Federalists were headed by Alexander Hamilton, and the first political party to have emerged in the United…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Massachusetts Delegation Research Paper

Massachusetts became the next hurdle to ratification. Afraid of the power of the central government and the absence of a Bill of Rights to temper that power, the Massachusetts delegation is divided. The Anti-Federalists, chiefly John Hancock and Samuel Adams, in the Massachusetts delegation are insisting on a reconvening of the national Constitutional Convention to address the addition of the Bill of Rights. Other states are agreeing that the document lacks the securities the states and the people…

Words 1042 - Pages 5

Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are the two constituents that United States worked under. Both the documents are similar in many ways. They were Documents formed by the same people. However, these documents are much more dissimilar than they resemble each other. Below are a few comparison points between the two documents. The formal name of the nation in the Articles was- “The United States of America”; and the Constitution name was “the United States of America”. In the…

Words 1166 - Pages 5

Ratification of the Constitution Final Project Essay

Ratification of the Constitution Many people believe that after the Constitution was drafted at the Constitutional Convention, the document was approved of immediately and a federal government emerged. However, they could not be any more incorrect. Many Americans at the time would have been unwilling to approve the Constitution in 1787. There were two perspectives of the Constitution. The two sides were led by different men, and had two very different perspectives of the Constitution and…

Words 1789 - Pages 8

Essay On The Great Compromise

Virginia Plan. The convention decided, after months of debate, that the legislature will be bicameral, meaning there will be two houses, one house will have equal representation, while the other is based on population of the state. After further argument, the delegates agreed to what is really a great compromise but also known as the Connecticut Compromise. Its known as the Connecticut compromise because Roger Sherman who has a large part in this compromise is from Connecticut. The house has the…

Words 779 - Pages 4

Apush 2 Sum Essay

confront the most appalling contradiction to republican principles-- slavery. During the Revolution period, abolitionist sentiment spread. By keeping the issue of slavery in public eye through writing and petitioning, African Americans undermined arguments advanced in favor of human bondage. The scientific accomplishments of Benjamin Baker, Maryland's first African American astronomer and mathematician, Boston's celebrated "African muse," made increasingly difficult for white Americans to maintain…

Words 1307 - Pages 6

Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

While the Constitution was being sent to get approval from state legislatures, delegates split into two distinct groups, the Federalists, and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist style of government provides a suitable argument to claim a place as the superior point of view. Federalists supported the Constitution and argued for immediate ratification. Perhaps the most famous Federalist is James Madison. He was a Federalist who went on to become the fourth president of the United States of America…

Words 833 - Pages 4