Ferguson V. Plessy Case

Words: 524
Pages: 3

In 1892, Plessy, an African American from Louisiana, took a train from New Orleans to Clifton and sat in a white carriage. The conductor commanded him to the black carriage according to the relevant provisions of the Louisiana law. Soon after Plessy refused to move, the captain of the train called the police to arrest him and hand it to the court for conviction. However, Plesi believes that he should enjoy the same social, political, and economic rights as all other U.S. citizens, and that the judges who handle the case are unfair. In federal district courts, Judge Ferguson violated the constitution and denied his right to judicial relief. The case was tried by the courts of various levels and the results were all against Plesy. Finally, he …show more content…
The difference in skin color between white and colored people is objective. A statute that specifies this difference in skin color does not undermine the legal status of the two peoples, nor does it create an enslaved service condition. Second, the Federal Supreme Court held that Louisiana’s “separate but equal” decree does not violate the 14th amendment to the Constitution. Although the constitution stipulates that the two races are completely equal before the law, they do not want to cancel the differences formed by different skin colors, nor do they want to mix the two races together. When two races are likely to come into contact with each other, the law allows the two races to be spatially separated. This does not mean that one race is inferior to another race. The Federal Supreme Court also exemplifies particularly apartheid schools. The Federal Court held that the establishment of apartheid schools for white children and children of color correctly exercised legislative power. The Supreme Court of Maasaisi also believes that the school committee has the power to establish special schools for children of different ages, genders, and colors. The District of Columbia and other