Leading up to the Supreme Court’s decision there were many trials before hand. The Plessy V. Ferguson case started in 1892 as a challenge to Louisiana's separate car act, which faced blacks and whites to stay in separate but equal areas on trains. Plessy felt this law was a violation of rights and unconstitutional. “Plessy, acting on behalf of a committee that had been formed to Jim Crow laws, intentionally broke the law in order to initiate a case.”() Because Plessy was a part of this committee it can be assumed that he felt very strongly about Civil Rights. Plessy was very smart and he knew that there was a case here that could be argued and that could get people involved in Civil Rights. “The …show more content…
A 7-1 decision stating to uphold the segregation law in favor of Ferguson. The court said that it was legal to have the segregation law as long as the facilities are “separate but equal”. “In the key passage of the opinion, the court stated that segregation was legal and constitutional as long as “facilities were equal.” The court allowed Louisiana to uphold this segregation law because technically it was legal. This doesn’t mean that it was ethical by any means though. People still to this day do not like this ruling even though it is correct. Plessy had a very valid point but it was never fully recognized and appreciated in his time