For instance, cases like Boyd v. United States and Mapp v. Ohio played pivotal roles in establishing foundational principles regarding the protection of individual privacy rights against governmental intrusion. Boyd v. United States affirmed the right of individuals to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by protecting against compulsory disclosure of personal papers and effects. Similarly, Mapp v. Ohio extended Fourth Amendment protections to the states through the incorporation doctrine, ensuring that evidence obtained through illegal searches and seizures was inadmissible in state courts. These cases represented notable shifts in interpretation, reflecting changing societal attitudes toward privacy and the growing recognition of the need to safeguard individual liberties against governmental …show more content…
Cases like Carpenter v. United States, which addressed the warrantless acquisition of cell phone location data, and Florida v. Jardines, which focused on the use of drug-sniffing dogs on private property, demonstrate the Court's efforts to navigate the complexities of modern surveillance practices while upholding constitutional principles. Lower court rulings on issues like the use of facial recognition technology and license plate readers further contribute to the evolving landscape of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. As highlighted by the Brennan Center for Justice, “Moreover, in determining the scope of the Constitution’s protections for data generated by digital technologies, courts should weigh the five factors considered by Carpenter: the intimacy and comprehensiveness of the data, the expense of obtaining it, the retrospective window that it offers to law enforcement, and whether it was truly shared voluntarily with a third party.”(The Fourth Amendment in the Digital age 2024) In conclusion, the Fourth Amendment remains vital in safeguarding personal freedoms amid today's technological