Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

Words: 611
Pages: 3
Open Document
The Gibbons v. Ogden Supreme Court case was a case that discussed whether the State or the National Government controls state to state commerce. The outcome of the Gibbons v Ogden case was entirely justified because of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, supporting Congress' right to control and regulate state to state trade. The case between began in around 1815 when former New Jersey Governor Aaron Ogden purchased a Fulton-Livingston license which allowed him to set up a steamboat route which was a monopoly between Robert Livingston and Robert Fulton. The monopoly of Livingston- Fulton began in 1808 when the New York legislature granted them a Monopoly of the use of steamships on waterways. Fulton and Livingston then sold their licenses to try and harm their competition. In 1815, Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons …show more content…
Ogden became furious claiming that he had bought the Fulton-Livingston license and Gibbons didn't. Gibbons rebuttaled and said that he had a license from a 1793 act of Congress. Ogden took Gibbons to the New York Court of Errors. The court ruled in 1820 that Gibbons' actions were poor. Gibbons' lawyer then claimed that the New York court of Errors was not the appropriate court to handle the situation, and it was brought to the Supreme Court. The case began discussion in the Supreme Court on Wednesday February 4th 1824. The Gibbons v Ogden case was brought to the Supreme Court because the argument involved both State and National Government issues. If Ogden's steamboat license was state issues but Gibbons' issues from the National Government, there was so definitive way for the State to make a proper decision. Gibbons' lawyer's actions brought the case to the Supreme Court in 1824, and it was a very smart move for him. Even though the New York court ruled against Gibbons, the Supreme Court ruled against
Show More

Related Documents: Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

Gibbons v. Ogdon Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license by the New York state government to use his ferries on the Hudson River (NY to NJ). Ogden was outraged when he found out that Thomas Gibbons operated two ferries along the same route. Mr. Odgen believed that the state had given him exclusive rights to the route and filed an injunction against Mr. Gibbons. The New York court supported Ogden’s claims and ordered Gibbons to stop using his boats; the New York Supreme Court also supported these…

Words 302 - Pages 2

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

The incomparable court case that I have picked is to explore is Gibbons versus Ogden that occurred in 1824. The principal section in the Gibbons v. Ogden story started in 1807, when Robert Fulton and Robert R. Livingston won the restrictive appropriate to work steamboats in New York waters. Before long, they won another select give to work steamships in the territory of Louisiana, along these lines acquiring control over a portion of the real business water courses in the Unified States. As noted…

Words 1379 - Pages 6

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

1. Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824): Definition: In this Supreme Court case, the justices declared that under the commerce clause, Congress had the ability to regulate navigation, which they considered interstate commerce. Current Event: In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that, in the case of Gonzales vs. Raich, Congress could ban the production of marijuana, under the commerce clause, similar to the Gibbons vs. Ogden court case. 2. Unitary System: Definition: A system of government in which there is…

Words 834 - Pages 4

Mcculloch Case Summary

Number 1: case questions The Supreme court established the principle of implied powers in the McCulloch case using the “necessary and proper” clause. The objective of the “necessary and proper” clause is to give Congress the power to make decisions or laws that are necessary for them to carry out their enumerated powers. 5. The McCulloch case ruling contributed to the strength of the national government because it gave the federal government the power to overrule state laws concerning…

Words 1211 - Pages 5