Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

Words: 834

Pages: 4

Open Document

1. Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824):
Definition: In this Supreme Court case, the justices declared that under the commerce clause, Congress had the ability to regulate navigation, which they considered interstate commerce.
Current Event: In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that, in the case of Gonzales vs. Raich, Congress could ban the production of marijuana, under the commerce clause, similar to the Gibbons vs. Ogden court case.

2. Unitary System:
Definition: A system of government in which there is a strong federal government that has supreme power.
Current Event: The federal government gained more power in the Clinton administration, with acts such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act giving more power to the central government, requiring states to protect certain rights. Although not a unitary system, it was a step which brought more …show more content…
7. McCulloch vs. Maryland (1819):
Definition: This Supreme Court case ruled that states could not prevent Congress from executing their implied powers as delegated by the Constitution, like Maryland attempted to by taxing the National Bank unreasonably.
Current Event: In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace stood at the door of the University of Alabama, refusing to uphold the Supreme Court decision of Brown vs. Board of Education and let African-American students enroll. Because of his attempt to prevent the federal government from enforcing their powers, the National Guard was mobilized, forcing Wallace to eventually let the students enroll.

8. New Federalism:
Definition: Proposed by the Reagan administration, New Federalism was a system of government in which some powers would be returned to the states by the federal

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

Gibbons v. Ogdon Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license by the New York state government to use his ferries on the Hudson River (NY to NJ). Ogden was outraged when he found out that Thomas Gibbons operated two ferries along the same route. Mr. Odgen believed that the state had given him exclusive rights to the route and filed an injunction against Mr. Gibbons. The New York court supported Ogden’s claims and ordered Gibbons to stop using his boats; the New York Supreme Court also supported these…

Words 302 - Pages 2

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

The incomparable court case that I have picked is to explore is Gibbons versus Ogden that occurred in 1824. The principal section in the Gibbons v. Ogden story started in 1807, when Robert Fulton and Robert R. Livingston won the restrictive appropriate to work steamboats in New York waters. Before long, they won another select give to work steamships in the territory of Louisiana, along these lines acquiring control over a portion of the real business water courses in the Unified States. As noted…

Words 1379 - Pages 6

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Study

The Gibbons v. Ogden Supreme Court case was a case that discussed whether the State or the National Government controls state to state commerce. The outcome of the Gibbons v Ogden case was entirely justified because of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, supporting Congress' right to control and regulate state to state trade. The case between began in around 1815 when former New Jersey Governor Aaron Ogden purchased a Fulton-Livingston license which allowed him to set up a steamboat route which…

Words 611 - Pages 3

Mcculloch Case Summary

Number 1: case questions The Supreme court established the principle of implied powers in the McCulloch case using the “necessary and proper” clause. The objective of the “necessary and proper” clause is to give Congress the power to make decisions or laws that are necessary for them to carry out their enumerated powers. 5. The McCulloch case ruling contributed to the strength of the national government because it gave the federal government the power to overrule state laws concerning…

Words 1211 - Pages 5