Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

Words: 775
Pages: 4
Open Document
In order to ratify our constitution, the founding fathers added the first 10 amendments or the bill of rights. They were designed to protect the basic rights that the british government had abused. Later the addition of the 14 amendment was extended to the bill of rights to the state level. This was made to inform individuals of their rights that the government cannot take away. While the bill of rights was made in 1791 it is still used today to protect human rights. The 2nd document was a political cartoon that showed the Texas v. Johnson court case. In the court case johnson burned a flag in Texas to protest Reagan's policy, Johnson was tried, convicted and sentenced one year in jail and a 200 dollar fine. Then he appealed that he he was …show more content…
This court case was about a man Clarence Gideon who was arrested and jailed for petty theft, and then when he went to trial he asked for a lawyer because he couldn't afford one but the judge refused to give him one, so he then proceed to lose his case and was given a 5 year sentest. Within those 5 years he writes a Writ of Certiorari to SCOTUS. That explains how he has the right to be given a counsel and then was given a new trial with a lawyer this time. This documents shows the american public the significance of the Gideon case to emphasizing the necessity of the what the 6th amendment guarantees. This shows that you are given these rights and they really are used and if you feel that someone took away or violated your rights you have the right to challenge the …show more content…
The government is just trying to keep everyone safe. 9/11 was a terrorist attack that happen in new york, the terrorists who did it we're living in the united states for a long time, while planning the attack. So after this happen the government got smart and said we need to protect the people from problems like this. So then software developers began designing programs that enhanced surveillance like facial recognition programs which matches suspected criminal or terrorist to keep an eye on them so we could stop them before anything bad happen. While some people and the ACLU think that the government is taking away the 4th amendment right, they are just limiting it to keep the public
Show More

Related Documents: Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

The case of Gideon vs Wainwright was full of complications. From the hardships gideon faced to get his case reviewed again, to the impact the results would have to all of those involved. The significance of this case was supported by others who faced the same injustice as Gideon. However, it came down to logic and common sense to acknowledge, that the complexity of this case was meant to pave the way for change in history. People sometimes will choose to neglect the truth for whatever the purpose…

Words 539 - Pages 3

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

The sixth amendment guarantees “the accused,” “in all criminal prosecutions,” “the Assistance of Counsel for his defense”, and via the sixth amendment’s incorporation in Gideon v. Wainwright this ubiquitous American right has come to represent a cornerstone of the US adversarial legal system. Justice, in the United States legal system, is secured through productive, agnostic conflict between two parties each representing their interests to the fullest extent of the law. As a result of this framework…

Words 1734 - Pages 7

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

as “shamefully inadequate” and found that the system “lack fundamental fairness and places poor persons at constant risk for wrongful conviction” (Mcgough, 2011). This revelation by the ABA, comes fifty years after the historic decision in Gideon v. Wainwright in which the supreme court, established the public defender system. Constructing the system, guaranteed all criminal defendants the right to a counsel while requiring states to provide a defense attorney to those defendants who cannot afford…

Words 795 - Pages 4