This seemingly arbitrary distinction becomes of ultimate importance when considering the legitimacy and outcome of applying the Strickland Test on de novo review to the case at hand. The majority opinion from the Strickland established a two pronged test to determine violations of 6th and …show more content…
No detailed rules or guidelines for adequate representation are appropriate…Any such set of rules would interfere with the constitutionally protected independence of counsel and restrict the wide latitude counsel must have in making tactical