Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

The case of Gideon vs Wainwright was full of complications. From the hardships gideon faced to get his case reviewed again, to the impact the results would have to all of those involved. The significance of this case was supported by others who faced the same injustice as Gideon. However, it came down to logic and common sense to acknowledge, that the complexity of this case was meant to pave the way for change in history.
People sometimes will choose to neglect the truth for whatever the purpose. For Gideon it was his background. The defendant was unprepared and unable to afford a lawyer because of his financial status.With no appointment of counsel, he was to defend himself from those already knowledgeable of the law. At this point Gideons fate was in the hands of his own ability to perform as a lawyer would. It was a complete foreshadowing of defeat, at least for the next couple pages. It did not make sense to trial him after the decision to not appoint him counsel. The judge should have …show more content…
The lawyer (Jacob ), that was chosen to defend Florida's state of corrections in this case, had strong feelings of the harm, the overruling of Betts vs Brady could cause on the justice system. He argued that there were many cases of poor prisoners, that did not receive counsel. If the Supreme Court overruled, there would be an overwhelming amount of prisoners free to file certiorari because of no appointment of counsel. Also there are not many lawyers available in Florida for those cases, that would become a hassle. Aside from that, lawyers were are not compensated for taking these cases that required money for research and other necessities. It was something Jacob had considered and he did have a point. The Supreme Court had to consider this possible outcome. Gideon deserves his right to counsel, but at the expense of a state's systematic

Show More

Related Documents: Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis