1. Summarize the experiment or effect.
Two people, a male and a female, were given two different pairs of headphones, they were told to put the headphones on while they watched the same animation. The animation was about two ping pong balls making an “x” shape while intercepting in the middle. The person who wore the black headphones, which did not have any sound, believed that the intersecting ping pong balls were crossing paths. The person wearing the white headphones believed that the ping pong balls were bouncing off each other while intersecting. This was due to the slight “pop” the listener was experiencing while wearing the white headphones.
2. What did you see/experience when you first looked at it?
During the introduction, I saw the ping pong balls cross paths. Later, when the “pop” sound was active, I saw them bounce off each other at their intersection. The third time, the ball pattern was accompanied by the “pop” every other time. It was strange seeing them alternate from crossing paths to bouncing off each other. I was amazed to see how the brain could change things we look at based on sound.
3. What specific stage(s) of listening …show more content…
Per the Synergetic Model, the sender’s message is influenced by noise, which can alter the message’s context. In this case, the sound determined whether the ping pong balls were crossing or bouncing off each other. The third and fourth stages were also affected, due to the domino effect of the second stage being affected. The reaction was different based on conscious stimuli, the “pop” sound. Because of the selection process and being told what noise to focus on, the viewer stops thinking and listening critically. This downfall of communication causes the viewer to just hear. The conclusion that could be achieved may or may not be