How Did The Battle Of Vicksburg Win The Civil War

Words: 681
Pages: 3
Open Document
The American Civil War consisted of many intense battles between the Union and the Confederacy. One of the most significant battles was The Battle of Vicksburg, a decisive Union victory during the American Civil War. This battle took place from 18 May 1836 - 4 July 1863. The battle for the Mississippi River resulted in a victory for the Union, due to General Ulysses S. Grants leadership qualities which align with my own goals as a 153A. This battle played a crucial role in the Union winning the American Civil War. The Battle of Vicksburg was a battle that occurred during the Civil War. During this time, the Mississippi River was a critical asset to both sides, the Union and the Confederacy. It allowed them to transport massive amounts of personnel …show more content…
Shortly after landing on shore, the Confederates made their way through Mississippi to their ultimate destination, Vicksburg. On July 4th, 1863, after 47 days of fighting, the Battle of Vicksburg was won by the Union. During this time, the Union and the Confederacy had multiple battles. General Ulysses S. Grant commanded his subordinates and provided guidance through multiple run ins and deadly fights with the confederate troops. The Union consistently persevered in this. Even when they were outnumbered and overwhelmed, they would retreat to resupply and recover, so that they could come back and hit the confederate troops again, prior to them recovering from the initial attacks. These battles took place several days apart and in different locations, with the Union getting closer and closer to Vicksburg and eventually succeeding in a final standoff. General Ulysses S. Grant displayed exceptional perseverance and leadership, which led him to get the winning results in the Battle of Vicksburg. Throughout the battle, Grants Army encountered several obstacles that could’ve been catastrophic if it were not for his quick and sound decision
Show More

Related Documents: How Did The Battle Of Vicksburg Win The Civil War

Essay Study Guide Ch 20-22

Study guide ch.20-22 1. “Lame-duck “president Buchanan- Define: believed that the Constitution did not authorize him to force southern states to stay in the Union. Significance: He did nothing. 2.Why secessionists supported leaving the union- Identify: -they were tired of abolitionist attacks -they believed that the North would not oppose their departure -The political balance seemed to be tipping against them -They were dismayed by the success of the Republican Party 3. Lincoln’s strategy…

Words 2125 - Pages 9

Essay about Review Chapter 14 And 15

nullification crisis. Before Lincoln even assumed the presidency, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Texas, and Louisiana had joined South Carolina in the Confederacy (the Deep South). After the battle at Fort Sumter, which set off the war, the states of the upper South also seceded. Start of the war Buchanan's Response: Believes that no state has the right to secede, but the federal government has no authority to stop them. Crittenden's Compromise: Proposed by John Crittenden from Kentucky.…

Words 5898 - Pages 24

How Did Ulysses S. Grant Become A Great President?

life he got a great education learning his fundamentals and much more. During his military career he learned how to tactically plan to do things. He did many good things for the south after the war as far rebuilding it and helping it get together and join the united states. Ulysses S Grant’s early life and military career led him to become a great president and help America. Ulysses S.Grant did many things in his early life to become a great presidency and have a good military career. Ulysses S. Grant…

Words 1351 - Pages 6

Abraham Lincoln Slavery

Abraham Lincoln, Slavery, and the Civil War edited by Michael Johnson, is a timeline of writings and speeches by Lincoln. With the assistance of Johnson, we learn of the choices and decisions Lincoln had to make during his presidency. Conflicting with his own moral beliefs, he tries to use his knowledge to keep states loyal and people to the union, while also creating consequences for those deciding to go. During his presidency, Lincoln had to make choices that did not align with his values but for…

Words 1598 - Pages 7

EOC Review Part 1 Units 1 3 Essay

EOC REVIEW Part I (1860-1900) TOPICS Civil War & Reconstruction Industrial Revolution & Progressivism The Civil War & Reconstruction Cause/Effects of War Abolition Movement Major Battles Postwar Reconstruction Plans Civil War and Reconstruction 1. Compare North and South Sectionalism ◦ North: industrial, used immigrants for labor, very populated ◦ South: agricultural, depended on slaves for labor, less population States’ Rights (South) v. Federalism (North) Representation in Congress…

Words 2114 - Pages 9

James K. Polk: Supporter Of Expansion In The United States

Polk made a compromise with them. He wanted the US-Canadian border to be moved to the 49th parallel. Finally, after rumors of war, the British government approved. In the South, the black majority was equal to whites and so the whites feared that the blacks were planning to take over. The whites fear was coming true. During the Reconstruction from the Civil War, black regimes were being formed to fight for their rights. Whites formed secret societies to undermine the regimes using violence…

Words 2814 - Pages 12

Why Did the South Lose the Civil War Essay

A frequently, and sometimes hotly, discussed subject; the outcome of the American Civil War has fascinated historians for generations. Some argue that the North's economic advantages proved too much for the South, others that Southern strategy was faulty, offensive when it should have been defensive, and vice-versa. Internal division in the South is often referred to, and complaints made against Davis' somewhat makeshift, inexperienced, government. Doubts are sometimes raised over the commitment…

Words 1835 - Pages 8

Essay about The Study of Ghenghis Khan and His Wise Words of Wisdom and the Like

Grant’s effect on the American civil war. Ulysses S. Grant was a simple man who changed the face of the earth. His ideals and theories on war have changed the way we look at war. His strategies and tactics changed the way in which wars were fought. Over the short course of his life, Ulysses S. Grant changed war. His tactics have since been used in all the great wars from WWI onwards. The term “civil war” may seem oxymoronic but it actually is, by definition, a war between citizens of the same country…

Words 2435 - Pages 10

Civil War Terms Essay

in all cases whatsoever" Meant more acts would be coming Townshend Duties (1767)Tax on luxury goods (lead, glass, paper, ink, etc.) Supposed to be good for the colonies, creator thought it'd be taken well Colonists angered, sent Circular Letter, did not appreciate taxation without representation Boston Massacre (1770) Violent confrontation between British troops and Boston mob Boston mob taunted British soldiers, shots broke out, 5 Bostonians killed Caused inflamed sentiment toward British,…

Words 8628 - Pages 35

APUSH 18 22 Review Essay

1. The Popular Sovereignty Panacea 1. The Mexican Cession lands opened a "can of worms" with the question, "What should be done about slavery in these lands?" 2. Further, with this question, the political parties (Whig and Democrat) were put into a tricky position. No matter which way they answered, half of the nation would be offended. 1. Largely, the parties simply chose to side-step the slavery-expansion question (give no clear answer) so as to offend no one, hopefully. 3. In the election of 1848…

Words 6600 - Pages 27