Why Did the South Lose the Civil War Essay

Words: 1835
Pages: 8
Open Document
A frequently, and sometimes hotly, discussed subject; the outcome of the American Civil War has fascinated historians for generations. Some argue that the North's economic advantages proved too much for the South, others that Southern strategy was faulty, offensive when it should have been defensive, and vice-versa. Internal division in the South is often referred to, and complaints made against Davis' somewhat makeshift, inexperienced, government. Doubts are sometimes raised over the commitment of Southerners to a cause many of them were half-hearted about. Many historians have argued that the South lost the will to fight long before defeat was inevitable. However, many of these criticisms could easily be applied to the North, had the …show more content…
Some historians deem the very nature of the Confederacy doomed to defeat. Ideologically handicapped by the doctrine of States' Rights, the Southern war effort was frequently hampered by the parochial and inward-looking political culture which prevailed in many states. When Lee's army was fighting to defend Richmond during the last days of the war, desperate for rations, Governor Vance of North Carolina was congratulating himself on stockpiling 92,000 uniforms and 150,000lbs of bacon, to be used solely by North Carolinian troops. Doubt has also been cast over the determination of its leaders to the cause. Jefferson Davis was a reluctant secessionist, Stephens was heard to remark that Lincoln was 'not a bad man', and even fire-eating Robert Toombs voted against the firing on Fort Sumter. Much of the criticism of the Confederate government could be equally well applied to the Union. Peace Democrats north of the border harassed Lincoln; opposition was loud in many quarters following the suspension of habeas corpus, and it appeared for a while that Lincoln would not win the 1864 election. However, the government of the Union was more united, and more effective.

Most historians agree that Lincoln was a greater leader than Davis, although at the start of the war it appeared that the opposite was true. The more experienced Davis soon built up a sound army, commanded by excellent
Show More

Related Documents: Why Did the South Lose the Civil War Essay

Why Did The South Lose The Civil War Essay

How important was slavery to the economy of the South? African slaves played an important role during the early days of the American economy due to shortage of labor. The fertile soil and favorable climate of the south made it an agrarian society where sugar, cotton, wheat, rice controlled the economy. However, with the shortage of labor the stakeholders bought African slaves and brought them to their plantations. The regions developed, industries developed too as they often employed slaves. Slaves…

Words 797 - Pages 4

The Cotton Gin's Effect On The Civil War

I believe the cotton gin had a huge effect on the civil war because when the “gin”was produced in 1794, it made the production of cotton a lot easier on slaves. This ended up doing the opposite of its intended use and and sparked the need for more slaves, this was a big reason the Civil War ever started. According to artifact civilwar.org, The South depended on cotton so when the cotton farms became bigger, so did the population of slaves. In there were so many cotton farms and slaves that in…

Words 443 - Pages 2

What Are The Advantages Of The South In The Civil War

the beginning of the Civil war both the North and South had many strengths and weaknesses. Although the South had advantages, the North had far more. The northern United States was known as the Union and the southern states were known as the Confederacy. The North had superior transportation, factories that helped produce weapons and resources for war, and also had a much larger population for working in factories and serving in the military. Though the south did lose the war, they were effectively…

Words 777 - Pages 4

Essay on Concept Investigation part 2 civil war

course of the Civil War? It is impossible to know for sure, because of the spotty records from that time period. The records indicate that there were about 250 thousand deaths on the Confederate side, and 350 thousand on the Union side. This would make a total of upwards of 600,000 deaths. However, modern historians indicate that the real number could be between 750 and 850 thousand fatalities. 2-Which states seceded to the Confederacy and when? Through the course of the Civil War, eleven southern…

Words 986 - Pages 4

Essay on Why Did Charles Lose the Civil War?

Why did King Charles lose the civil war? In April 1642, the Civil war started in England. The civil war ended up by King Charles losing the war. And in my essay I am going to talk about many reasons why Charles lost the civil war. In 1642 most people thought that King Charles would win the civil war, as he had won the battle of Edge hill, but unfortunately King Charles did not take advantage of this opportunity and marched to London. King Charles didn’t know what to do when it came to big…

Words 1055 - Pages 5

The Civil War: Slavery In The Northern States

The civil war, to many people, was the war on slavery. Although there were many other reasons why the civil war happened and one of the main reasons it occurred was because there was an unfair voice in the government among the states. There was more representation for the Northern States than the Southern states. The Southern states were mostly made up of slaves compared to the population of the Northern states. Now the population that counted towards the amount of representation in Congress was…

Words 1160 - Pages 5

Summary Of The Lost Cause Myth

The second interpretation regarding the popularity of the Lost Cause is that it gained prominence during the Reconstruction Era. This viewpoint is given by Sarah E Gardner in Blood & irony : Southern white women's narratives of the Civil War, 1861-1937, which focuses on the role of white women in the spread of the Lost Cause myth. In it, she states “Reconstruction left white southerners with remarkably little to claim in the present. Many could, however, see hope for the future, and they could at…

Words 1532 - Pages 7

Essay on History Stydguide

Nullification * Theory that states have the right to nullify a national law that they see as unconstitutional * If a state fid a law unconstitutional, they do not have to follow it and they could remove themselves from the Union * The South Carolina Exposition and Protest * Tract written by Calhoun in which the nullifiers got their name from * John C. Calhoun was the vice president * The Force Act * Gave the president power to put down nullification by military…

Words 2515 - Pages 11

Abraham Lincoln's A Nation At War

A Nation at War “A house divided against itself cannot stand. “ (Abraham Lincoln) After decades of disagreement and division, the southern states couldn’t take any more. The South split off and formed a Confederacy with their own president and fought for their independence. Both sides of the nation fought for 3-4 years, after the many years of fighting both had enough conflict and war. The country finally joined together again in 1865. After the newly found country settled down conflict arose in…

Words 1746 - Pages 7

Essay about Vietnam War final

Vietnam War and New Zealand’s involvement Kathryn Butcher The New Zealand’s contribution of military personnel and the involvement in the Vietnam War caused a significant division amongst the nation’s people with people having opposing opinions on whether New Zealand’s response was justified. The Vietnam War was essentially a civil war between the divided South Vietnam and North Vietnam…

Words 2234 - Pages 9