History 4.2, Summer 16
Exam 1
1. There are a few main factors that enabled Europeans to topple the Aztec and Inca Empires in the Americas. The Europeans had better weapons such as armor, rifles, muskets, and bullets and horses compared to the Aztec and Incan Empires. Not only weapons, but the Europeans had allies. They had the support from the Native Americans. Furthermore, there were many diseases such as measles and smallpox that the Europeans brought with them that also helped in wiping out the Aztec and Incan Empire. The American tribes had no natural immunity to the diseases. This led to the killing of the rulers of both the Aztecs and Incas, along with millions of other people. The government of Spain had also played …show more content…
The many main effects of the Columbian Exchange was the exchange of diseases, ideas, food crops, and populations between the New World and the Old World. The Columbian Exchange positively affected the lives of the Europeans. They gained many things such as, crops, like maize, and potatoes, land in the Americas, and slaves from Africa. However, the Columbian Exchange impacted the Africans negatively. The increase in the demand for slaves drove other rival tribes to capture others and sell them to the Europeans. This lead to Africans feeling dehumanized and valued only for their physical labor. The Columbian Exchange had both positive and negative effects on the Native Americans. A positive was that, through trade, they acquired new animals and crops that were native to the eastern hemisphere such as, livestock or beasts of burden, as well as wheat and barley. However, the Native Americans also experienced epidemics in the form of new diseases, like smallpox, brought over by the …show more content…
Napoleon rose to power in the midst of near-chaos in France. His successes on the battlefield along with his strong governmental control encouraged a French nationalism that brought Europe to its knees. Napoleon’s laws were spread throughout Europe during the expansion and remained important in many countries today. His rise was a logical consequence of revolutionary events. He was a good leader because he was a strong military commander who then seized power in France, claiming himself emperor. He won stunning victories. While he may have taken advantage of an unstable government and economy in order to secure his position of authority; the French people craved powerful, yet fair