This leads to people believing that restrictive immigration policies are more important than the overall importance of law enforcement. The policies more so result in the separation of families, mistreatment of immigrants, and denial of basic rights and opportunities. These policies can push against a less restrictive immigration regime, which makes it hard for any changes to happen. I believe that immigrant counter-publics could contribute to the change of less restrictive immigration regimes. When reading Going Public by Cristina Beltrán, immigrant counter publics mean to have specific spaces that are created by immigrant communities to talk, organize, and advocate for change in response to discriminatory immigration policies. These spaces allow immigrants to voice their concerns, share their concerns, their experiences, and push for collective action. Beltrán stated, “Supporters saw the demonstrations as an attempt to claim and express …show more content…
The authors stated, “The argument is that international migration is mainly driven by structural factors such as labor market imbalances, inequalities in wealth, and political conflicts in origin countries, factors on which migration policies have little or no influence. Rather than affecting overall volumes of inflows, immigration restrictions would primarily change the ways in which people migrate, such as through an increased use of family migration or irregular means of entry” (Mathias Czaika and Hein de Haas, page 487). These authors speak on what goes on with the immigration policies and how they can work. These authors gave a good explanation on why immigration happens, which then leads the readers to think about all the awful things that happen to the immigrants upon arrival. Another source I found is called Evaluating the Impact of Immigration Policies on Health Status Among Undocumented Immigrants: A Systematic Review by Omar Martinez, Elwin Wu, Theo Sandfort, Brian Dodge, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, Rogeiro Pinto, Scott Rhodes, Eva Moya, and Silvia