The Constitution gives all the power to the federal government to regulate immigration, and none to the states. The constitutional foundation for federal control over immigration is also reinforced through the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has determined that Congress has an extra-constitutional power over immigration, "The Supreme Court determined that Congress had an extra-constitutional plenary power over immigration based on the "incident of sovereignty" rather than any specifically enumerated power." Cases like Arizona v. United States and Chy Lung v. Freeman have established that immigration regulations fall under the purview of the federal government. These rulings emphasize the importance of a national approach to immigration, ensuring that individual states cannot create laws that conflict with federal laws and regulations. Allowing limited state autonomy within the federal framework enables states to address their unique demographic, economic, and social needs, fostering innovative solutions and responsive policies tailored to local conditions while maintaining overall national …show more content…
States with large immigrant populations might focus more on social services. This flexibility can lead to more effective and tailored solutions that a one-size-fits-all federal approach might not achieve. State laws allow for states to address local problems, "...it has a patchwork of immigration laws at the federal, state, and local levels that overlap, complement each other and sometimes are in tension. Yet while state and local policies are ostensibly designed to either restrict or grant privileges to immigrants, they also have spillover impacts on the native-born". This evidence highlights how state-level policies can innovate and respond to local needs, something that only federal policy can do. This balance between state and federal policies can help address unique local challenges and opportunities across different states while maintaining national coherence. In conclusion, the federal government should maintain the primary influence over immigration policies in the United States to ensure consistency, coherence, and adherence to constitutional