Clemens went on to emphasize “capture or kill” a few times during the article. Though the “Christian” military had the option of just capturing those “savages”, they chose to kill them. There were 600 men, women, and children who were no match for the U.S. soldiers, and they weren’t expecting the attack either. The unfair advantage the troops had over the Filipino people was unjust but General Wood still went through with the attack. Wood felt it was his duty to finally take over the Philippines no matter what it took to do …show more content…
There was no interest in the lives lost on the Philippines side. Only the U.S. soldiers were remembered. That was until the end when photos of the massacre emerged however it was still celebrated in the media as General Wood’s troops that beat the savages. The troops were able to overcome adversity even though they had a choice in capturing the Filipinos and to save their lives as a Christian would do. Instead, they allowed their power and ego to overtake them during the attack to see how many heads they could blow off. It was almost as if they were playing a video game in real life and forgot that they were holding this community’s fate in their palms. The media portrayed this massacre as heroism. The soldiers came back from Moros with less people their troops but a great story to tell which was that they were gallant in their quest. Clemens could have equated this attack to the what the Spaniards did to the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Cuba when they initially took over the islands with pillaging and raping those who lived there. The U.S. soldiers did not go as far as to take over the community, instead, they just killed everyone