Informed Consent: The Henrietta Lacks Case

Words: 917
Pages: 4

The major issues with the concept of Informed Consent as it relates to the Henrietta Lacks case is did she or did she not give consent for her cells to be taken and used for research.
Some would argue that she did by seeking medical treatment and then agreeing to be treated by John Hopkins Research Hospital. Others would argue that the right questions weren’t asked or she may not have understood what was being said to her at the time of treatment for cancer. Another issue that has been debated is did class, race, and gender have a role in informed consent at the time of Henrietta’s case. The intersectionality of Henrietta being poor, black, and female, uneducated may have played a role in the taking of her cells and all that followed in her case. The topic of informed consent was barely being discussed when Henrietta was being treated for cancer. Today there are laws and regulations governing informed consent and there are still issues relating to how
…show more content…
First, you have David Korn, vice provost for research at Harvard University that believes the consent issue is overshadowed by a public responsibility to science. David Korn states, “I think people are morally obligated to allow their bits and pieces to be used to advance knowledge to help others. Since everybody benefits, everybody can accept the small risks of having their tissue scraps used in research” (Skloot, 320-321). Opposing you have Lori Andrews, director of the institute for Science and Law and Technology at the Illinois Institute of Technology. Andrews states “Science is not the highest value in society” (Skloot, 321). She argues that autonomy and personal freedom are truly important. Her argument is about dying and where your money goes. The point is that when you die you chose who gets your money and it does not matter if it benefits the greater