Into The Wild Analysis

Words: 774

Pages: 4

Open Document

Incomprehensible Minds
Everybody has their own mind. Each being as if it were a snowflake. Each having its own delicate thoughts, and none are the same. The human mind is unique from person to person. Understanding someone else's story and mentality is truly impossible.
The incapability of understanding someone else's thoughts, is demonstrated in the novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer. The novel records events of others trying to understand the mentality held by the main character, Mccandless. In the beginning of Into the Wild, the author explains, "He was offered membership in Phi Beta Kappa, but declined insisting that titles and honors are irrelevant." (28) Most students would be greatly honored to be offered a membership in a program like Mccandless was, but unlike most, Mccandless declined the offer. The author was unable to piece …show more content…
He explains that nobody truly knew why Mccandless would have turned it down. The author also states, "It is hardly unusual for a young man to be drawn to a pursuit considered reckless by his elders."(182) This reveals that other young adults may relate to the actions of Mccandless, and that these people may make similar reckless decisions. However, it is not truly known if these reckless decisions were made for the same reasons, meaning no one knows what thoughts went through Mccandless mind when actions, such as giving away all his money, belongings and food, and leaving home without warning, were made. People may have theories about Mccandless motives, but it is truly impossible for any researchers to completely understand why Mccandless left to go into the wild. Lastly, Krakauer explains, "Roman, Andrew, and I, stay up well past midnight trying to make sense of Mccandless's life and death, yet his essence remains slippery, vague, and

Into The Wild Analysis

When reading the poem Invictus and the story of Into the Wild it occurred to me that we have complete control of our own fate. These pieces of literature display what it is like to have control of our lives. Some of the other texts try to tell us we are born to do something and just that one thing, I believe, because of these texts, you can control your fate, be the master of your destiny, and have complete control of life. The first piece of poetic evidence that I have is Invictus. This…

Words 489 - Pages 2

Analysis Of Into The Wild

all. I agree with the author as it is the ultimate end to life itself and nobody can be there for someone when they die. I believe the essay from which the quote comes from is related to Into the Wild because the author knows how the fear of death can grip you in it's claws. The Author of Into the Wild describes that he has felt “stiff with fear” and commented on that “ the idea of my own death was still largely outside of my conceptual grasp .” sitkine “There was something grand and barbaric in…

Words 1702 - Pages 7

Into The Wild Analysis

and everything he knew, and hitchhike into the Alaskan wilderness. Sean Penn’s 2007 Into the Wild is a wonderfully directed experience, filled with beautiful cinematography and based on a thought-provoking adventure. But as marvelous as the movie is, it’s only a fabricated representation of reality. Some people, such as myself and Christopher McCandless, crave the truth in life. The character…

Words 983 - Pages 4

Rhetorical Analysis Of Into The Wild

Rhetorical Analysis Author Biography & Ethical Appeal: Jon Krakauer the author of Into the Wild was born April 12, 1954 in Brookline, Massachusetts. He was the son of a doctor and an amateur mountaineer. At age eight, he started mountain-climbing in Oregon where he grew up as a child. He attended Hampshire College in Amherst and after graduating he was a carpenter and worked as a commercial fisherman in Colorado and Alaska. He devoted most of his free time to climbing in the mountains. In 1977…

Words 557 - Pages 3

Into The Wild Movie Analysis

Into the Wild captures a young man's idealism to escape from society and live freely off of the land, particularly in Alaska. Sean Penn and Jon Krakauer use various techniques in the creation of the film and the novel. The different characterization of the protagonist, Chris McCandless, paints two contrasting pictures. The tone in which the story is told differs, but the facts are generally the same. In the novel, Into the Wild, Krakauer investigates Chris's life and comments on the aspects that…

Words 757 - Pages 4

Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

Dialectical Journal: Into the Wild by Jon Krakauker Passage: “My point is that you do not need me or anyone else around to bring this new kind of light in your life. It is is simply waiting out there for you to grasp it, and all you have to do is reach for it. The only person you are fighting is yourself and your stubbornness to engage in new circumstances” (Krakauker 57). ( R ): For most of the novel, Chris possesses a sense of invincibility. He places no limits on himself and is a visionary…

Words 2311 - Pages 10

Into The Wild Syntax Analysis

Throughout the book, Into The Wild, the author, Jon Krakauer, uses complex sentence structures and syntax in order to show the complexity of the main character, Chris McCandless. Chris is a very intelligent individual, with a lot of excitement to explore the world and see what it has to offer. Using the structure of syntax, Krakauer often interrupts his sentences with appositive phrases to provide further description of his subjects. These appositives and descriptions are intended to provide a sense…

Words 335 - Pages 2

Into The Wild Analysis Essay

In the book, Into the Wild, written by Jon Kraukuer, Krauker tells the tale of a daring individual who is in search of the real meaning of life. This man is known as Chris McCandless. Chris rebelled against society and journeyed to Alaska, where he survived in the wild for 113 days before he passed away. To this day, people ponder whether or not this was a good decision and if Chris really did find the bliss he was desperately looking for in the wild. Krauker writes, “ McCandless didn’t conform particularly…

Words 701 - Pages 3

Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

In the non-fiction work Into the Wild, the author, Jon Krakauer exudes a tone and perspective particularly in his viewpoint towards Christopher McCandless through writing in such a way to convey the story of a tragic hero. In the author’s note, Krakauer admits he cannot be an impartial biographer and recounts the moments before McCandless’ death as “one or two seemingly insignificant blunders” and “honest mistakes”, thus revealing a sympathetic attitude towards him. Subsequently, he believes “it…

Words 251 - Pages 2

Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

Krakaur’s purpose in writing Into the Wild was to tell a story about Chris McCandless, portraying him as superior and enlightened in ways that didn’t seem to add up to his actions, leading him to add in chapter eight. The author’s purpose was to compare and contrast the actions of Chris to other adventurers who sought the same fulfillment as him, doing so until their inevitable end, meaning to deem Chris’ actions as sane. John Waterman was one of the likewise minds, having grown into the same smart…

Words 351 - Pages 2