Is Intervention Ever Justified?

Words: 1327
Pages: 6
Open Document
Is an intervention in another state ever justified? First, there has to be an understanding of what an intervention is, and Nye defines Intervention as the, “external actions that influence the domestic affairs of another sovereign state” (Nye 209). A justified intervention is when one state needs to intervene in another state for individual justice and human rights. Intervention is a liberalist idea because it is there to seek progress and liberty. So, it is then easy to say that the intervening that the U.S. did in Iraq in 2003 was not justified because there was immediate danger to the U.S. and or any of its allies. However, an intervened attack on ISIS would be justified because there is individual justice and human rights in danger. Liberalists …show more content…
Intervention is a Liberalist idea that seeks progress and liberty, while keeping cooperative security. Cooperative security has four points’ transnationalism, integration, collective action, and democratic peace theory. In other words cooperative security is trying to seek greater relations among states, while intertwining other states economies and working together for a greater benefit than one state would receive by acting alone. From a liberalist point of view intervention is needed if cooperative security cannot be maintained, as well as for individual justices and human rights. When it comes down to intervention being justified, only cases involving individual justices and human rights is it truly justified, but to maintain cooperative security it can go either way when determining if intervention in that particular case is justified. Nye says that for liberals, “the key international institution is a society of individuals. Therefore, intervention can be justified if it promotes individual justices and human rights; it is permissible to intervene on the side of “good”” (Nye 211). Nye is saying that from a liberalist point of view the only time intervention should be used is if your own security is at risk or for humanitarian efforts. Otherwise, intervention is unjustified in any other circumstance and is seen as another state intervening to assert their dominance …show more content…
By not intervening and helping groups who face massacre there is no respect for their autonomy or rights. Wye says, “In 2005, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution accepting a responsibility to protect people suffering from unavoidable catastrophe, but humanitarian intervention remains contentious” (Nye 213). Based on the UN’s decision in 2005, they took most of the responsibility to intervene in these kinds of situations, but other states can intervene if necessary as long as its justified. Walzer’s final exception to help secessionist movements is justified, “If a group of people within a country has clearly demonstrated that it wants to be a separate country, it is legitimate to assist its secession because doing so helps the group its rights and develop autonomy” (Nye 213). It is legitimate to assist a secessionist movement but when is a movement worthy of receiving assistance? Nye exclaims that, “Part of Mill’s argument was that to have a legitimate claim, a people must be able to seek its own salvation and fight for its own freedom” (Nye 213). As long as the movement can clearly demonstrate that they can secure themselves and protect their freedom they are worthy of assistance and it is
Show More

Related Documents: Is Intervention Ever Justified?

Pros And Cons Of Preemptive Intervention

Is an intervention in another state ever justified? First, there has to be an understanding of what an intervention is, and Nye defines Intervention as the, “external actions that influence the domestic affairs of another sovereign state” (Nye 209). A justified intervention is when one state needs to intervene in another state for individual justice and human rights. Intervention is a liberalist idea because it is there to seek progress and liberty. So, it is then easy to say, that the intervening…

Words 1602 - Pages 7

Autonomy Vs Paternalism

officials and medical professionals. They look at your all around preferences and judge them on a standard of deeper preferences when configuring limitations and freedoms. However, there are four types of preferences that prevent paternalistic intervention. They are relevant, settled, preferred, and your own preferences (Komrad 2014). As long as officials are convinced you are acting on one or all of those preferences, they have no right to step in. The disadvantages to paternalism are that most…

Words 2082 - Pages 9

Essay Criminal Case Analysiselsiefial

Running head: Criminal Defense Case Analysis University of Phoenix CJA 354/Criminal Law Week 2 Criminal Defense Case Analysis Professor Peter Lukevich Elsie Farias May 11, 2015 Defense of Third Person The American Criminal Justice system is an ever evolving entity. Laws and statues have continually morphed and been altered to meet the American societal needs. With this, there have been many different types of defenses, justifications and excuses within the Criminal justice system. All geared…

Words 1022 - Pages 5

Schindler's Ark Research Paper

Is it ever justified to kill another human being? In his book, the Schindler’s Ark, Thomas Keneally famously stated, “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.” This book, set in the era of Nazi Germany, is written about a member of the Nazi Party who attempts to save his Jewish employees from the wrath of his own party. The aforementioned quote highlights the importance of each individual and supports the claims that even one man can make a difference. The above idea, that each life is sacred…

Words 1026 - Pages 5

Essay about Vietnam War final

Kathryn Butcher The New Zealand’s contribution of military personnel and the involvement in the Vietnam War caused a significant division amongst the nation’s people with people having opposing opinions on whether New Zealand’s response was justified. The Vietnam War was essentially a civil war between the divided South Vietnam and North Vietnam and the two political views that the nation was categorised as; Southern Vietnam primarily being non-communists and the Northern communists. It was…

Words 2234 - Pages 9

PWAD 272 Paper 2

this essay, I want to focus on one well-known philosopher in particular, Allen Buchanan. Buchanan analyses, in depth, revolutions and the ethics associated with them in his article “The Ethics of Revolution and Its Implications for the Ethics of Intervention,” which is part of a larger journal compilation, Philosophy and Public Affairs, in which many philosophers and philosophically inclined writers from various disciplines present their arguments and opinions. In a particularly interesting section…

Words 3263 - Pages 14

Would euthanasia ever be justified? Essay

Tessa Stepa HCP/PHI120 Euthanasia Would euthanasia ever be justified? Should we listen to what the patient would want? Should we put ourselves in the patient's place? Should we do to others what we would want done to us? The answers to these questions are not as easy as it may seem. This is because many moral issues are involved. Everyone dies eventually. When it happens, however, it is not the same for all of us. For some, it is fast and almost painless. For others, however, it comes with what…

Words 945 - Pages 4

Ten Amendments To The Constitution

The British would invade a colonist’s privacy due to taxes or actions against the crown. The colonist didn’t want to pay or be held responsible for taxes and payments they felt weren’t justified. According to the website called “Swindlelaw.com”, King George accused the colonist of “writs of assistance”, “which were legal search warrants that were extremely broad and general in scope”. This allowed British officials to enter colonist’s homes…

Words 824 - Pages 4

Essay about British Colonize Nigeria

The British people had discovered vaccines that challenged some of the main killer viruses in Africa. However most of the people of Nigeria still objected to the colonization of their country. The Europeans justified their colonization through the theory of Social Darwinism, survival of the fittest. The people of Great Britain had taken many of the recourses in Nigeria to use them for their own benefit. So the African people got something from the people of Great…

Words 954 - Pages 4

Imperialism: Vladimir Lenin and Nineteenth Century Imperialism Essay

the world as the natural successor to the British Empire and that the greatest danger the U.S. represents is that the world will not get enough American Imperialism because U.S. leaders often have short attention spans and tend to pull back troops when intervention becomes unpopular. It will be very interesting to check back into the debate on Imperialism about ten years from now and see how Niall Ferguson’s point of view has fared! The other great school of thought about Imperialism is, of course…

Words 3899 - Pages 16