John Stuart Mill Self Harm

Words: 1244

Pages: 5

Open Document

Mill’s harm principle as described in the simplest of terms is when an action is only punishable if it is doing harm to others. This principal is expanded to the government by saying the government is only allowed to restrict the freedom of someone if they are/are going to harm someone else. Mill’s stance on government regulations is very loose. It is extremely hard to convince him that something is illegal, because he says there has to be almost 100 percent certainty that the action will cause harm to another. While Mill’s view on the laws and government regulations may not be a very common outlook, there is no denying that he never wavers from his beliefs that freedom is the most aspect to protect in our society. The first topic that …show more content…
So in theory Mill should be fine with self-harm because it does not limit or infringe upon someone else’s freedom or rights. Laws for drugs are a key example. By using drugs you are only affecting your own body with the substance which is completely fine by Mill, which means that he should disagree with all laws restricting the use of drugs. However your actions on some of the drugs have the potential to negatively affect those around you. This causes a problem for Mill, because he believes that nobody’s freedoms should ever be infringed upon. This leads him to split his view on drugs down the middle. He believes that the laws prohibiting the drugs that don’t cause you to harm those around you like marijuana and heroin for example should not be banned because they do not infringe upon anybody else’s freedoms or rights. While drugs like PCP where the users become extremely violent should be banned because there is an almost certain chance that someone will

John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill was an early philosopher who aspired for a political society where man was not bothered by life demanded by other. To live at our own demands and our own choices was the true vibrancy of life that Mill believed all man craved. Mills faith in humans and their rationality created the harm principle. The harm principle was introduced, which states, “That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of…

Words 930 - Pages 4

Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriage

Christina Hernandez PHI021 Essay No. 2 Gays should have the right to marry and have children with whomever they choose and raise their children however they want. Being gay is not a choice. Some people are simply born with a natural attraction to the same sex. This attraction to the same sex is just as natural to them as an attraction to the opposite sex is for straight couples. There is no reason to penalize gays for doing what comes to them naturally, being attracted to the same sex. Gays…

Words 494 - Pages 2

Kant Vs. Mill-A Battle Of Ethics

Danielle Becerra Professor Reich Philosophy 101 May 19, 2015 Kant vs. Mill - A Battle of Ethics Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill were two philosophers who impacted modern ethics and morality forever. They each have two very different explanations for what they believe to be morally right or wrong. Kant’s view, simply put, is all people should not adjust what their “duty” is to mankind, no matter what may happen in the end, because it is morally just. Mill’s approach is that the consequences…

Words 1311 - Pages 6

Essay on katie s midterm for philosophy

PM Friday People Plato- Ring of Gyges, Psychological egoism Jeremy Bentham- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness/Hedonistic Calculus John Stuart Mill- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness Aristotle- Intellectual Virtue, Principle of the Mean, Moral Virtue, Teleology Immanuel Kant- Categorical Imparative/ Goodwill Epicurus- Ataraxia, Happiness, Epistemology John Rawls -The Two Principles of Justice Concepts Moral Philosophy (Also known as ETHICS)- is the study of morality using the methods of philosophy…

Words 2696 - Pages 11

John Stuart Mill Individuality

Mill would argue that since individuality is valued in society, the desire to restrict liberty would have to overcome the social value of individuality. However, members of a utilitarian society would not place as much value on individuality as they do on maximizing happiness for the greatest number of people and would want to limit liberty based on the net positive effect it would have for community members. Mill’s argument is not based in utilitarianism, but rather a liberal perspective that values…

Words 1148 - Pages 5

Similarities Between Nietzsche And Vonnegut

What do classical liberals such as Locke and Smith teach about economic inequality? Both John Locke and Adam Smith believe that humans are rational in nature, they are able to make sound judgment without government interference. In fact, they believe the role of government should be limited to provide security, public services and enforcing…

Words 515 - Pages 3

John Stuart Mill

Matt Oz Western Civilization November 18, 2008 Milling for an Answer John Stuart Mill’s center focus in his essay asks the question of how a body of government can control an individual’s way of life when every individual requires a different way of living. Mill’s idea of liberty was the checks and balances of the world that was soon to be engulfed with imperialistic views. Late 1800’s in Europe was an “era of ambitious conquest” to conform more parts of the world to one way of thinking…

Words 830 - Pages 4

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

of last time: Outline of the subject matter of this course: 4 units, each reflecting a different approach to normative philosophical ethics: 1. Teleological/Consequentialist Ethics: Utilitarianism and egoism. Readings by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Bishop Joseph Butler; critique by Dostoevsky; some relevant contemporary feminist reflections by Marilyn Frye. 2. Deontological ethics: Immanuel Kant: Sections 1 and 2 of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals; Kant's notorious essay…

Words 7807 - Pages 32

week2assignment Essay

conflicts with the more important duty to protect innocent human life. In these cases, lying may be morally justified. This view will lead to the notion of: Prima facie duties.    The development of proper self-esteem (the duty of self-improvement) in deontology requires that we: Cultivate the good will.    Which of the following, according to Kant, is a characteristic of moral maxims and duties? They are universally binding.…

Words 1547 - Pages 7

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Lecture Outline: John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) 1. brief, why do we need limits on government’s ability to act? 2. Freedom of action: When can society legitimately interfere? 3. Liberty of Thought & Discussion: how much? Reasons? (3-1/2 reasons) 4. Individuality %%%%%%% Why study Mill? What does he add to Classical Liberalism? utilitarian value of liberty for individual, society; Why is individual liberty important? what is the social value of individual or eccentric opinions and actions, even…

Words 2655 - Pages 11