John L. O’Sullivan: Manifest Destiny Essay

Submitted By hnguyen11
Words: 2101
Pages: 9
Open Document
Primary Source
John L. O’Sullivan—“Manifest Destiny”: John L. O’Sullivan, a newspaper editor in New York City, was the premier supporter and spokesman for westward expansion. O’Sullivan backed Democratic President James Polk’s desire to annex Texas, Oregon, and California. In his support he wrote many articles and coined the term “Manifest Destiny” to describe America’s inevitable future occupying the North American continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
John O'Sullivan, "Annexation," United States Magazine and Democratic Review 17, no.1 (July-August 1845): 5-10
Texas is now ours. Already, before these words are written, her Convention has undoubtedly ratified the acceptance, by her Congress, of our proffered invitation into the Union; and made the requisite changes in her already republican form of constitution to adapt it to its future federal relations. Her star and her stripe may already be said to have taken their place in the glorious blazon of our common nationality; and the sweep of our eagle's wing already includes within its circuit the wide extent of her fair and fertile land. She is no longer to us a mere geographical space--a certain combination of coast, plain, mountain, valley, forest and stream. She is no longer to us a mere country on the map. She comes within the dear and sacred designation of Our Country; no longer a "pays," she is a part of "la patrie;" and that which is at once a sentiment and a virtue, Patriotism, already begins to thrill for her too within the national heart….
Why, were other reasoning wanting, in favor of now elevating this question of the reception of Texas into the Union, out of the lower region of our past party dissensions, up to its proper level of a high and broad nationality, it surely is to be found, found abundantly, in the manner in which other nations have undertaken to intrude themselves into it, between us and the proper parties to the case, in a spirit of hostile interference against us, for the avowed object of thwarting our policy and hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions….
It is wholly untrue, and unjust to ourselves, the pretence that the Annexation has been a measure of spoliation, unrightful and unrighteous--of military conquest under forms of peace and law--of territorial aggrandizement at the expense of justice, and justice due by a double sanctity to the weak. This view of the question is wholly unfounded, and has been before so amply refuted in these pages, as well as in a thousand other modes, that we shall not again dwell upon it. The independence of Texas was complete and absolute. It was an independence, not only in fact, but of right. No obligation of duty towards Mexico tended in the least degree to restrain our right to effect the desired recovery of the fair province once our own--whatever motives of policy might have prompted a more deferential consideration of her feelings and her pride, as involved in the question. If Texas became peopled with an American population; it was by no contrivance of our government, but on the express invitation of that of Mexico herself; accompanied with such guaranties of State independence, and the maintenance of a federal system analogous to our own, as constituted a compact fully justifying the strongest measures of redress on the part of those afterwards deceived in this guaranty, and sought to be enslaved under the yoke imposed by its violation. She was released, rightfully and absolutely released, from all Mexican allegiance, or duty of cohesion to the Mexican political body, by the acts and fault of Mexico herself, and Mexico alone. There never was a clearer case. It was not revolution; it was resistance to revolution: and resistance under such circumstances as left independence the necessary resulting state, caused by the abandonment
Show More

Related Documents: John L. O’Sullivan: Manifest Destiny Essay

John L. O Sullivan's Manifest Destiny

The article “Manifest Destiny,” written by John L. O’Sullivan, the book Undaunted Courage, written by Stephen E. Ambrose, and the painting “American Progress,” by John Gast, all exemplify Manifest Destiny and westward expansion. Both of these events changed the United States forever. In all three materials, each one shows the the Americans’ relationship with the land can be seen, and they materials also show the Americans’ desire to control and own something they could not truly possess. In the…

Words 692 - Pages 3

Mexican American Imperialism

The ideas for the War with Mexico were born from the ideals of Manifest destiny and in a time when America sought to show her military power. The ideas of both patriotism and nationalism following the war of 1812 spawned a desire within Americans not only to expand westward, but to show of the strength of the Nation’s military. In 1820 James Monroe issued his Monroe Doctrine which stated that United States would no longer be open for colonization or conquest, of course this didn't mean that America…

Words 889 - Pages 4

Manifest Destiny Research Paper

Manifest Destiny Ethan Merrill Bonneville High School U.S History Mr. Pyper 5/24/2024 Manifest Destiny Manifest Destiny, a 19th-century doctrine, posited that the United States was destined by Providence to expand across the North American continent. This belief was rooted in a combination of nationalism, religious fervor, and economic ambition and significantly helped in shaping the nation's history and identity. Coined by journalist John L. O'Sullivan in 1845, the term encapsulated the American…

Words 576 - Pages 3

Manifest Destiny Research Paper

Pros and Cons of Manifest Destiny The term manifest destiny was first used by John L. O'Sullivan in 1840 to describe what most Americans at the time believed was their mission from God—to expand the United States from coast to coast. Along with expanding their territory, they should spread their institutions and traditions in order to liberate and enlighten other civilizations, such as the Indians and Hispanics who were considered inferior therefore deserving cultivation. By the end of the 19th…

Words 626 - Pages 3

Argument Against Manifest Destiny

As a result of America’s need for more land, the idea of “Manifest Destiny” was conjured. Early America was met with lots of immigration. Manifest Destiny was the idea that it was a God-given right for white men to own all of North America, and some saw it as the fate of American to own all of North America. America felt that it should own the continent Pacific to Atlantic coasts. They would extend American liberty to new territories. Americans would expand North West, and it was mainly fur trappers…

Words 1129 - Pages 5

The Pros And Cons Of Dewey's Annexation Of Mckinley

Dewey’s success in Manila led to the annexation of Hawaii in July 1898 under McKinley. Queen Liliuokalani had first been overthrown by U.S. Marines in 1892 but when Pres. Grover Cleveland came into office he rejected the treaty of annexation. The navy then set their sights on another annexation, one that would serve as a coaling base: Guam, a Spanish island in the central Pacific. The desire to have a global navy became apparent and so was Pres. McKinley’s new ambition, “We must keep all we get;…

Words 235 - Pages 1

American Imperialism - Essay

term manifest destiny was first coined in 1845 by John L. O'Sullivan. He wrote, He wrote: "Our Manifest Destiny is to over-spread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." Americans believe that they were the only people in the world who had the right and blessing of God to settle land everywhere. Even the government believed in manifest destiny, President Polk tried to buy Cuba and Mexico but failed and started war instead. Manifest Destiny…

Words 996 - Pages 4

The Mexican-American War

Throughout the history of the United States, the essential objective of its foreign policy has been to secure the nation’s interests. The United States has taken military and economic foreign policy actions to achieve that goal. There actions have resulted in varying degrees of success. Fighting the Mexican-American War was an action taken by the United states to protect its national interests. Another Action taken was the building of the Panama Canal. The Mexican-American War was a war with Mexico…

Words 400 - Pages 2

How Did The American Revolution Affect The World

America's Birth Affects The World E’Maurai G, Seth G, Jonathan L, (Student) When America gained its independence from Britain many others were affected by a new country being born and a new order of government being in use in the world. America affected many people which range from Great Britain, to native Americans, to the country of France and Germany America had caused many changes to our world. American Revolution didn't just affect Great Britain it affected the entire world. A decade or…

Words 422 - Pages 2

Manifest Destiny Analysis

Manifest Destiny is a phrase that expresses the belief that the United States was destined to expand the entirety of the North American continent, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific. Promoters of Manifest Destiny believed that expansion was not only good, but that it was obvious (manifest) and certain (destiny).99 The term combined a belief in expansionism with other popular ideas of the era such as: American exceptionalism, Romantic nationalism, and a belief in the natural superiority of what…

Words 1499 - Pages 6