Juveniles Being Tried As Adults

Words: 746
Pages: 3

Juvenile Justice Essay The difference between an adolescent and an adult is not much in the idea of their acts of violence. As kids grow and develop into teens, and soon adults, they begin to grasp the knowledge of “right and wrong”. Even though there are other aspects that can influence a child into making decisions, acting on their decisions is almost always intentional. Being tried as an adult in the eyes of the court system is the correct direction to go in this day and age. A minor should have no excuse granted, just because of their age. They will be treated as equals to the older generations. Taking an action that can’t be taken back is something that exhibits as unforgivable and intolerable in the eyes of most. In the 1990’s, a boy …show more content…
As Tate was tried as an adult just 2 years later, the act that he performed has no excuse. The harm that kids can have in a community is as great as any other person. Their will to act in their harmful ways is no different and should be treated no differently. In the 1980’s, the rate of crime from juveniles rose immensely. Ever since then, opinions of kids being tried as adults have been lobbied. “The nation’s juvenile arrest rate for murder fell 68 percent from 1994 to 1999, hitting its lowest level since 1966, according to the Justice Department. The juvenile arrest rate for violent crime overall fell 36 percent from 1994 to 1999.” (Lundstrom 19) As statistics prove that arresting kids as adults and not as kids is a successful design, the lack of mercy towards juveniles is effective as well. Although it is a tough move to go through, it teaches the youth the consequences and morals of committing a serious crime. As the tables have turned over the next 20 years, the idea has come across the minds of others as “cruel” and “insensitive”. A young man named Nathaniel Brazill, 14 years old, is on trial for shooting a school