Both Malcom Gladwell and Judith Ortiz Cofer had well written articlkes. Mr.Gladwell ebgins his speech with a hook which draws the reader ina nd allows thm to geta feel for the topic. He then talks about how back during the civil rights movement protesting was doifferent thanit is now. He explained hs point saying back then there was a leader and through socizal media there is …show more content…
Her stylke was similar to Gladwells in some aspects. For exampolke when she was beginnign a new paragraph she would use and anecdote tpo draw the reader in by givcing them an idea pf what she was about to write/expalin. In addiytoon to that her narrticie was in a fe=isrt oersons poin tof view. As she wemnt on to explain certain things hispanic women had to go through she has cacophonous tone often disliking the way they (hispanic women in partcular) were shown in the media. After she was done expalinimng the struggles of the hispanoc women all over the world shed add in her perosnal experonce to prove its wasnt wa figment of her imagination. She also had very long and detailed senteces which alloewd the rersader to get on a personal level with her undertsnading the ay she thiyght. In all wha6t caused my coinclusion of her having the strongest, more convinig arguement was soemwhat based on her