PhD; Levitt, Philip MD. The Detection, Analysis, and Significance of Physician Clustering in Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Payouts. Journal of Patient Safety 16(4):274-278, December 2020. | DOI: …show more content…
In Kolar v. Donahue, the court must not have aligned with the litigation that the Kolars sought to defend. As a result, “The Kolars lost the homeowners litigation, and the court entered judgments against them that included attorney fees totaling $957,824” (Donahue). Nevertheless, in opposition to that case, usually the court will side with the plaintiff. As “most malpractice suits with payouts reflect both patient injury and error” (Oshel). Consequently, illustrating how, similarly to other sources, the importance of monetary effects substantiates the complex portrayal of malpractice. While plaintiffs have time to reminisce and plan for the future, the defendants –doctors– have their lives uprooted by events that most likely happened years ago. For example, in Link v. Wabash the case was brought back up “some six years later,” modeling the negative impact that these types of cases have on the lives of doctors (Ambrosio 1). Many futures in civil courts depend on how the civil court feels, the following case represents what happens if they do not care enough to analyze emotional appeals. As in the Link v Wabash case, “The circumstances here were such as to dispense with the necessity for advance notice and hearing” (Ambrosio 2). Naturally, the loss of advanced notice could critically change the results of a case, and it can be assumed that