Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform

Words: 513
Pages: 3

Linden Sanders Mrs. Downs English 8 30 April 2024 Criminal Justice Reform From various perspectives, the courtroom is perceived as too harsh and unbalanced in terms of race. This has caused an increase in the prison population and a major uproar over how courtrooms and sentencing should be managed. Abolishing minimum mandatory sentencing laws and reducing bail for non-violent crimes will result in fairness and equality in the courtrooms. First, mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines should be removed because they require people who commit non-violent crimes to serve the same amount of jail time as violent criminals. The text states, "People who commit nonviolent crimes are given the same sentences as those who have used violence" (Getting …show more content…
Mandatory minimum sentence laws should be reformed so certain racial groups are not unfairly treated. Furthermore, people who cannot afford bail are stuck in jail and are incapable of providing for their families. According to the text, "Because they are in jail, they can't go to their jobs or be with their families" (Bail Reform Will Level the Playing Field). Bail amounts should be lowered because non-violent criminals lose their jobs because they cannot pay the high amount, causing them to lose their jobs. Apart from this, the text says "Even without bail, most people show up for their trial date and most people do not commit new crimes while waiting for trial" (Bail Reform Will Level the Playing Field). By lowering bail amounts, more people will be able to rebuild their lives and find a job while awaiting trial. However, some people think minimum sentencing laws are necessary to help keep their communities safer. The text states "One criticism of removing mandatory minimum sentencing laws is that it doesn't replace prison sentences with services such as drug counseling or job training" (Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform: More Needs to be