Mapp Exclusionary Rule Violations

Words: 963

Pages: 4

Open Document

On the afternoon of May 23rd, 1957 police officers stormed the apartment of Dollree Mapp, an employee of illegal gambling rackets linked to Cleveland kingpin Shon Birns, after hearing from an anonymous tip that a suspect in a bombing and information on illegal betting documents and equipment were in her house. The illegal material was believed to be employed in a numbers racket maintained by Mapp’s boyfriend Edward Keeling. Police officers asked to enter Mapp’s home, but were refused after Mapp contacted her lawyer who advised her to not allow them without a warrant. Police officers later returned en masse and stormed the house by forcing themselves through the door of Mapp’s home, ignoring her protests. Mapp demanded to see a search warrant, and was presented with a piece of paper which was never presented in court. The police officers did not find the suspect, but instead found some paraphernalia linked to Keeling and sexually explicit pornographic material. After being cleared on the numbers racket paraphernalia, Mapp was charged with the violation of Ohio state law that prohibited “lewd, lascivious, or obscene material” (Bill of Rights Institute, n.d.). Mapp made an appeal based on the …show more content…
The exclusionary rule, which holds that evidence that is collected unlawfully and or in a manner that violated the rights of the defendant, was originally applicable only on the federal level. This was after the case known as Weeks v. United States (1914) which created the rule, but only on the federal level. Many of the states rejected this rule up until the rulings after Mapp’s case which enforced the rule down to the state level (FindLaw, n.d.). The gathering of evidence in violation of the Fourth Amendment by the Cleveland police officers in Cleveland led to the exclusionary rule being applied to the states as well by the Supreme

Mapp Vs Ohio Case Summary

Nikenia Keys 10/6/15 CJL2000 Case Brief: Case Citation: Mapp v Ohio, 367. U.S. 643 1961 Case History: This case began in the county court of Cleveland, Ohio where Mapp was convicted of possession of illegal lewd and obscene items. She appealed the conviction to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eight Judicial Circuit because the local police officers entered her home without a search warrant initially looking for a bombing suspect. The court approved her conviction and she then appealed her…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Essay On Exclusionary Rule

The exclusionary rule prevents the police offers from conducting unnecessary searches and seizures. In addition, any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment will be inadmissible in court. The evidence found from the unnecessary searches, or forbidden searches are normally ignored as they are considered unreasonable and are considered to be fruits of the forbidden fruit. In the cases where the police have conducted the unreasonable or forbidden search for the evidence of a crime, such…

Words 503 - Pages 3

What Is Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

Introduction: Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark case in U.S. constitutional law that addressed the issue of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1961, the case significantly influenced the application of the exclusionary rule, which prohibits evidence obtained through illegal searches or seizures from being used in criminal trials. This synopsis provides an in-depth analysis of the case, its background, legal arguments…

Words 531 - Pages 3

Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

The federal court case of Mapp V. Ohio was a very important landmark case for the United States Supreme Court in relation to the fourth amendment and this case was also the first case where the exclusionary rule was applied. Mapp’s house was illegally searched by police from an anonymous tip and evidence of reason for police to show up was never found. The legal provision for this case was the fourth amendment. The appellant was Dollree Mapp and the appellee was Ohio. This took place in Cuyahoga…

Words 1458 - Pages 6

Supreme Court Case: Mapp V. United States

received information that a suspect in a bombing case might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to Mapp’s home and asked Mapp for permission to enter. Mapp refused to let them in absent a search warrant. Two officers left the home while one stayed behind. Later that day, the two officers returned with backup and an imitation warrant. Wielding this paper, they broke through the door. Mapp asked to see the officers “warrant” and put it in her dress. There was a struggle and the…

Words 575 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Exclusionary Rule

The exclusionary rule is a judge-made rule, adopted by the courts to stop the police from conducting illegal searches and seizures. The constitution merely says the people shall be free from unreasonable searches. It doesn't say what the courts should do once an unreasonable search and seizure has taken place. The courts finally decided on the exclusionary rule, the rule that says that evidence illegally seized may not be used as evidence, as a means of enforcement. "We're sorry" doesn't quite cut…

Words 410 - Pages 2

Exclusionary Rule Impact

The Impact of the Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Justice In the United States criminal justice system, the Exclusionary rule has heavily played a huge and important role as a safeguard we have in our system in America. A crucial safeguard against any kind of unlawful government intrusion or any kind of illegal searches or police misconduct. The exclusionary rule is something that prohibits anyone using most or almost all evidence in any case that was gathered and obtained to not be able to be used…

Words 893 - Pages 4

Mapp V. Ohio Summary

Case Brief Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Facts: In response to a reported presence of a potential bombing suspect that was thought to be living in Dollree Mapp’s residence, Ohio law enforcement officials forcibly entered Mapp’s home without consent. The police officials initially requested to enter her house to search for the bombing suspect, equipment, and gambling equipment. Upon learning about it, Mapp consulted her lawyer about it. Mapp declined the request of the police officers without…

Words 541 - Pages 3

Dollree Mapp Case Study

Dollree Mapp was arrested in her home, in Cleveland Ohio, for possession of “obscene” material. Initially, Cleveland police received a report that a suspect from a bombing a few days before was residing in Dollree’s house. Officers then went to her home and asked to be let inside, but Dollree called her lawyers and they informed her that she only has to let the police in if they have a legal warrant. The officers admitted to Dollree that they did not actually have a warrant, so Dollree refused their…

Words 687 - Pages 3

Mapp v Essay

Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Matthew Gosselin Illegal search and seizure • This case is based off a illegal search and seizure on property within a home in the state of Ohio in 1961. the petitioner claims that the obscene materials for which she was convicted of the crime were discovered by an illegal search of the house. The Facts about the case • Three police officers arrived at Mapp’s home pursuant to information that a person was hiding out. This person was wanted in questioning for a…

Words 501 - Pages 3