Supreme Court Case: Mapp V. United States

Words: 575

Pages: 3

Open Document

In May of 1957 Ohio law enforcement received information that a suspect in a bombing case might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to Mapp’s home and asked Mapp for permission to enter. Mapp refused to let them in absent a search warrant. Two officers left the home while one stayed behind. Later that day, the two officers returned with backup and an imitation warrant. Wielding this paper, they broke through the door. Mapp asked to see the officers “warrant” and put it in her dress. There was a struggle and the officers took the paper and handcuffed her. The officers did not find the bombing suspect during their search of Mapp’s home. They did, however, find pornographic books and photographs. Mapp was charged with violating Ohio state law prohibiting “lewd, lascivious, or obscene material.” She was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, and sentenced to one to 7 years in prison. No search warrant was introduced as evidence at her trial. …show more content…
She based her argument on First Amendment grounds, arguing she had a right to possess the explicit material. When the case reached the Supreme Court, they did not address her First Amendment claim but nullified her conviction for another reason. The court said that the evidence used against Mapp should never have been admitted in trial because it was seized without a legitimate warrant which violated her Fourth amendment rights. The Court addressed concerns of Mapp’s 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” and the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to state law. It addressed whether the search of Mapp's home was legal and if the evidence seized through that search was admissible in court. As Weeks v. United States, 1914, established the exclusionary rule barring the admission of illegally obtained evidence in federal

Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

The federal court case of Mapp V. Ohio was a very important landmark case for the United States Supreme Court in relation to the fourth amendment and this case was also the first case where the exclusionary rule was applied. Mapp’s house was illegally searched by police from an anonymous tip and evidence of reason for police to show up was never found. The legal provision for this case was the fourth amendment. The appellant was Dollree Mapp and the appellee was Ohio. This took place in Cuyahoga…

Words 1458 - Pages 6

5 cases Essay

23, 1957, Ohio police came across a case that involves the 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” and the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights under the 14th Amendment. Police received information that a suspect of having illegal betting equipment, and a suspect for a bombing case can be located in the house of Dollree Mapp. Three Cleveland police officers went to Dollree’s home and asked for permission to search the home but Mapp refused to let them search without…

Words 670 - Pages 3

Us Supreme Court Essay

MAPP V OHIO Mapp V Ohio is a famous Supreme Court case that has affected many American lives. Police officers suspected Miss Mapp of owning a bomb in her house. The officers attempted an initial visit but failed. After that they returned with a search warrant for a bomb, police forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search. Obscene materials have been found but no bomb. Miss Mapp was trialed and convicted for these materials. The constitutional issue of the case was whether evidence…

Words 1143 - Pages 5

Mapp v Essay

Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Matthew Gosselin Illegal search and seizure • This case is based off a illegal search and seizure on property within a home in the state of Ohio in 1961. the petitioner claims that the obscene materials for which she was convicted of the crime were discovered by an illegal search of the house. The Facts about the case • Three police officers arrived at Mapp’s home pursuant to information that a person was hiding out. This person was wanted in questioning for a…

Words 501 - Pages 3

Essay On Exclusionary Rule

The Exclusionary Rule is a law that prohibits the use of evidence into a trial if such evidence was obtained in a search that violates the United States Constitution. The Exclusionary Rule was put in place to maintain the Fourth Amendment which is one the cornerstones of the Constitution. It protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, sets the framework for the warrant rule, and introduces the concept of probable cause into police procedures The Exclusionary Rule is intended to refrain…

Words 551 - Pages 3

Constitutional Policing

Constitutional Policing Our text states “The criminal justice system is bound by laws that criminal justice actors must follow. This body of law is known as procedural law. If criminal justice actors violate procedural laws, criminal cases can be "tossed out," and if the violation is serious enough, the criminal justice professional can be held legally responsible.” (Wright, 2012). However, there are many cases that have been in court and many arguments have been fought considering if the law was…

Words 1361 - Pages 6

What Is Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

Introduction: Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark case in U.S. constitutional law that addressed the issue of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1961, the case significantly influenced the application of the exclusionary rule, which prohibits evidence obtained through illegal searches or seizures from being used in criminal trials. This synopsis provides an in-depth analysis of the case, its background, legal arguments…

Words 531 - Pages 3

Supreme Court Cases: Freedom Of Speech In The First Amendment

The Supreme Court is the highest federal court. Each year thousands of people try to have the Supreme Court look at their case because for these people it is the last resort for justice, however most of the time the Supreme Court cannot view these cases. Approximately eighty cases or one percent of the cases are accepted each year. Once accepted they have a briefing and an oral argument. Soon after the justices of the Supreme Court make a precedent. Whenever the Supreme Court sets a precedent they…

Words 738 - Pages 3

Mapp V. Ohio Summary

Case Brief Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Facts: In response to a reported presence of a potential bombing suspect that was thought to be living in Dollree Mapp’s residence, Ohio law enforcement officials forcibly entered Mapp’s home without consent. The police officials initially requested to enter her house to search for the bombing suspect, equipment, and gambling equipment. Upon learning about it, Mapp consulted her lawyer about it. Mapp declined the request of the police officers without…

Words 541 - Pages 3

Mapp Exclusionary Rule Violations

officers stormed the apartment of Dollree Mapp, an employee of illegal gambling rackets linked to Cleveland kingpin Shon Birns, after hearing from an anonymous tip that a suspect in a bombing and information on illegal betting documents and equipment were in her house. The illegal material was believed to be employed in a numbers racket maintained by Mapp’s boyfriend Edward Keeling. Police officers asked to enter Mapp’s home, but were refused after Mapp contacted her lawyer who advised her to not…

Words 963 - Pages 4