Mcgraw Hill Personality Test

Words: 2140
Pages: 9

Completion of the McGraw Hill Personality Test has returned a myriad of results about my personality, some of which were previously known, but many others had not yet been seriously considered. The results of this test reveal an introverted person who desires to allow to seek fulfillment on his own terms without the restraints of tradition or authority. Although my leadership skills were revealed to be strong, there are glaring weaknesses in the form of communication and conflict resolution. These weaknesses are considered more in depth to seek to understand them deeper for the purposes of becoming a better employee and manager. Ultimately the weaknesses are considered in a far greater scope, seeking to understand the role that the Holy …show more content…
I can still remember becoming aware of my sin, not that I did not know it was there, I was keenly aware of my wrongdoing. This was a deeper understanding that my actions were not only wrong in the eyes of those around me (parents, friends, etc.) but were a sin against a holy God. This realization was frightening, but as Dr. Fischer (2006) states this is God “initiating grace in our lives”. I am grateful for that initiation.
The realization of my sin brought about the need for reaction, in this case being repentance. In the same way, the understanding of these personality tests brings about a similar action. Being fully aware of just how uniquely God has made me as an individual, weaknesses included, allows me to act and work to improve upon those weaknesses as best as
…show more content…
My weaknesses, coupled with humility and a willingness to submit to the plans of the Lord through the Holy Spirit can transform me in ways that I could not even imagine in my own limited thinking. For as verse 10 tells us “For when I am weak, then I am strong” (ESV).
References
Fischer, K. J. (2006). The gospel and personal reflection. Liberty University. Retrieved from https://learn.liberty.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-17114148-dt-content-rid-152533894_1/courses/BMAL500_B04_201730/BMAL500_LUO_8WK_MASTER_ImportedContent_20170214045435/The_Gospel_and_Personal_Reflection.pdf
Jit, R., Sharma, C. S., & Kawatra, M. (2016). Servant leadership and conflict resolution: a qualitative study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(4), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-12-2015-0086
Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2016). Organizational behavior: A practical, problem-solving approach (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Kroeger, O., Thuesen, J. M., & Rutledge, H. (2002). Type talk at work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
Liberty University. (n.d.). Presentation 5 – Organizational