Female candidates are portrayed as trustworthy, sympathetic and qualified candidates at first, but later on this isn't the case. When a woman is elected and in power a lot of sexist media coverage takes place. Because of this people feel as if women are not able to govern as well as men. A prime example in sexism with female politicians is when they are asked how the role of being a mother will affect their ability to lead. Many believe woman can't juggle being a mother and a leader at the same time, but how is that fair? Not once have I heard or read in the media about a man being asked how being a father would affect his role as a leader, so why should a woman be asked? The media also has many questions about the stability of female politicians. This is based on the stereotype that all women are emotional and won't be able to control their feelings in intense situations. I've even heard a joke myself about if a woman was president and she was upset, she would start a war with another country because her emotions got the best of her. If that isn't the most ridiculous thing I have heard I don't know what is. This is what the media wants us to think about women being leaders. They should play the role as only a mother because they can't be a mother and be a strong leader. That women are too emotional to be able to lead a country. The media needs to learn how to cover women in politics without degrading them in the process. When we read news stories about women in politics or even sports I feel as though I am reading directly from a male perspective. Mostly, you see men covering new story about the next politician, but are they qualified to do so when the politician is female? In my opinion, I don't think they are. Many news stories and articles are biased towards woman in the sense that they make women appear as if they will never be qualified to lead. The media will support a man to guide