Mill Free Speech

Words: 1439

Pages: 6

Open Document

Humans have feet to walk, and hands to hold; they have brains to think, and mouths to speak; then, would it not be right to let us express our opinions to others freely? Freedom of expression has, in recent decades, become of exponential importance in society, especially after the fall of feudalism through the rise of democratic societies. Free speech does not involve the threatening and extortion of others, even if these are forms of speech, but rather free speech allows individuals to have the right to criticise public officials and ideals without governmental control, along with the aim of persuading others to adopt one’s beliefs through discussion (Schauer, 1982). In his book titled On Liberty, John Stuart Mill allows the idea that free speech is best understood as a “marketplace of ideas” to emerge. However, the first person to use the exact term was not Mill, but rather Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes during a session in the United States of America Supreme Court decision Abrams v. United States (Holmes, 1919). Numerous philosophers, theorists and scholars have discussed about the previous description for …show more content…
Personally, I am more keen to agree with the theory regarding the marketplace as I believe that in one way or another there is an exchange of goods occurring in public discourse, for instance the gaining of knowledge or the gaining of followers who believe your opinions. Both Liberalism and the definition of ‘truth’ allow one to gain insight on what it means to be involved in free speech and this poses great advantage over the marketplace theory of such. As time passes, ideas will change, and goods will evolve, demand will be different and supply will be provided for such. It is therefore important not to fall for a well posed theory, as this too has loopholes as society

Analysis Of The Second Treatise Of Government By John Stuart Mill

Chapter II of On Liberty, John Stuart Mill forms a strong argument for any limitation on the liberty of thought and discussion. Mill argues that “If all mankind minus one, were of the opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind” (Mill, p.14). In The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, Locke argues for the aims of government and the proper extent…

Words 1373 - Pages 6

John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill was an early philosopher who aspired for a political society where man was not bothered by life demanded by other. To live at our own demands and our own choices was the true vibrancy of life that Mill believed all man craved. Mills faith in humans and their rationality created the harm principle. The harm principle was introduced, which states, “That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of…

Words 930 - Pages 4

Philosophy Essay 2

(3) Explain and evaluate the principles John Stuart Mill uses to decide when we should be free to do as we please and when the government is justified in controlling our actions. Provide examples of each situation. Do the same for the issue of individual freedom of speech versus government control of speech. Why does Mill think that these principles are best? For our purposes, "explain" means to state the theory and to describe the important features of the theory in a manner that an intelligent…

Words 1213 - Pages 5

Finding Truth In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

What Mill is imposing can result in a rather limited form of societal power; where people are not restricted in their speech or action, so long as their speech or actions do not violate another person's’ liberty. Moreover, what Mill considers as harmful does not include harm or criticism to ideas. Instead, Mill advocates for free speech and debate, so ideas can be criticised in a rational manner, leading to logical deduction that can allow for ideas to be closer to the truth. In chapter 2, Mill argues…

Words 1560 - Pages 7

John Stuart Mill First Amendment

religion, speech, press, assembly, and government petitions. However, many throughout history in the US and the world have attempted to limit this right and silence those who differ in opinion. Unlike most who argue the importance of the freedom of speech, John Stuart Mill argues the evilness of silencing speech and states the argument of free speech is one of the past. Mill states that even when an opinion may be wrong or differ from others, it is necessary to be heard. Suppressing speech that could…

Words 432 - Pages 2

Summary: No Free Speech Without Hate Speech

No Free Speech Without Hate Speech The current rise of nationalism in Europe, along with the rise of Donald Trump in America has led to an increase in the use of the term “hate speech” in the nightly news reports across the country. Yet, there is no actual legal definition of Hate speech. The American Bar Association defines hate speech as , “ speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits” (“Debating…

Words 1304 - Pages 6

The Painted Bird Analysis

Kosinski, Freud, Marx and Mill all hold divergent opinions regarding human behavior, the state of human self and the role of society over its citizens. Freud and Kosinski share perhaps the most outwardly negative views of people, likening them to barbarians whose natural state without civilization is very violent and visceral. In The Painted Bird, Kosinski explicitly depicts the brutality of human nature through the horrid events that the protagonist witnesses in the rural villages, as well as…

Words 2175 - Pages 9

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Lecture Outline: John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) 1. brief, why do we need limits on government’s ability to act? 2. Freedom of action: When can society legitimately interfere? 3. Liberty of Thought & Discussion: how much? Reasons? (3-1/2 reasons) 4. Individuality %%%%%%% Why study Mill? What does he add to Classical Liberalism? utilitarian value of liberty for individual, society; Why is individual liberty important? what is the social value of individual or eccentric opinions and actions, even…

Words 2655 - Pages 11

Florence Kelley Speech Analysis

Florence Kelley is a reformer who fights for child labor laws and better working conditions for women. At the National Assembly Women Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905, Kelley recites a speech talking about the issues of child labor laws. She uses rhetorical strategies such as repetition of the many negative aspects of child labor through specific examples, criticism of states regarding their policies, and emotional appeal. By using a combination of figures, logic, evidence, and…

Words 936 - Pages 4

Florence Kelley Persuasive Speech

Imagine being a young child in Georgia, working in the textile mills, all hours of the night. You’re robbed of education because you have to work. You hear that Alabama does not allow children under sixteen to work for more than eight hours, well you’re twelve, so why are you working eleven hours at night while your family sleeps? You think to yourself that this isn't right, isn't there someone out there who can stop all of this, isn't there someone out there who cares about you? Luckily there is…

Words 139 - Pages 1