Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Essay

Submitted By MrGoldfishEyes

Words: 364

Pages: 2

Open Document

Written by Tsar Nicholas himself, Source B showcases an extract from the October Manifesto, implemented in the year 1905. It outlines both the rules and changes the Tsar promised to enforce within that year. With the perspective of the source being from Tsar Nicholas, it hence proves to have a more bias and persuasive perspective. Being from the person directly linked to the source, it seeks to persuade the reader of the changes for the future whilst also providing factual information. Source B is also somewhat reliable as it seeks to persuade the responder of the changes the Tsar was willing to implement ‘for his people’ so as to gain a positive response regarding the content.

Source B would be of moderate usefulness for an historian investigating the effectiveness of the October Manifesto in providing a solution to the problems in Russian society. The perspective and reliability of the source both increase the usefulness to an historian, as it is factual, official decree and seeks to inform the reader through presenting the facts of concern. However, the source itself speaks of the promises and intentions of the Tsar for change within the Russian society, which the Tsar did not entirely follow through with. The Tsar’s incompetency as an autocrat during his reign proved to be one of the main causes of the fall of Russia, thus highlighting his need to ‘prove and advocate’ to his people that they could place their trust in him. The source provides detail on how the Tsar

Essay about Tsar: Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Nicholas

Russia was facing many crises in the early 20th century. Russia wasn’t very industrialized and had a weak transportation system because they were an agricultural society. Russia was a poor agrarian society and they opposed nationalism because they were multi-ethnic. The Tsar of Russia was Nicholas II, who was married to Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. Tsar had many challenges towards his power that have happened throughout history including protests. Tsar depended on his army to keep his power. The…

Words 707 - Pages 3

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? Essay

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? 1917 saw the February revolution, the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of 300 years of Romanov rule and centuries of a Tsarist regime ruling Russia. The reasons why Nicholas II was forced to abdicate can be explained in terms of beliefs, such as Nicholas II belief in autocracy, circumstances, such as world war one, and actions, such as Nicholas’ decision to take direct control of the armed forces. In this essay I will be arguing that circumstances…

Words 1449 - Pages 6

Tsar Essay

Tsar Nicholas II The Tsar crowned as supreme ruler of Russia was in need of a new face, so in 1894 a new Tsar was crowned. Nicholas II became the new Tsar of Russia and was praised by many peasants upon his crowning, often referred to as ‘The Little Father of Russia’ he was seen as the saviour of the country but later throughout his reign he would be seen as a weak leader and a failure to the people. His upbringing would cause him to not agree with the necessary change and reform that the people…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

turn of the twentieth century saw Tsar Nicholas' reign over Russia from the years of 1894-1917 fall at the hands of the Romanovs, causing the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. There were numerous factors that contributed to the decline of the autocracy, led by Tsar Nicholas II. Nicholas' resistance to creating change caused many problems for Russian society. The Tsar refused to take advice from others as he believed it posed a threat to his authority, which the Tsar feared to a great extent. The October…

Words 821 - Pages 4

February Revolution Essay examples

international scene as the February Revolution in Russia. As far as outcomes are concerned, the end of Tsardom as one of them, historians are quite in agreement. However, there is a strong division between those who believe that the Great War (1914-1918) destroyed Tsarism or merely accelerated its destruction. Some historians argue that the war was the primary reason for the Tsar’s downfall. Steve Smith (2002), believes, with an optimist’s perspective, that by 1914 Russia was beginning a slow process of Westernisation…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

Russian Revolution Research Paper

Czar Nicholas II Czar Nicholas II came to power in 1894. He believed in his father, Alexander III’s, belief that absolute power of the tsars should be preserved. However Nicholas II lacked the vision and responsibility required of a leader. Nicholas II allowed many of his decisions to be heavily controlled by his wife, Alexandra, and a peasant named Rasputin. Rasputin was able to stop their hemophiliac son from bleeding so Alexandra and Nicholas trusted everything Rasputin said. Also, Tsar Nicholas…

Words 1824 - Pages 8

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

The development of opposition to the Romanov Dynasty before 1914 was a build-up over time of the Romanov Dynasty and Tsar Nicholas II’s rule. It was a build-up of tension and repression amongst the Russian people. Russia at the time was made mostly of peasants living in poverty, and made up 80% of the population of Russia and only had 20% of the nation’s wealth. The nobility and Tsar’s family had most of the nation’s wealth. The Tsar’s family and nobility, including the Orthodox church, shared a…

Words 1697 - Pages 7

Russia's Autocracy In Russia

At the turn of the twentieth century, Russia remained one of the few countries in the world under autocratic rule. This meant that the Tsar held almost unlimited authority over the country, and “granted the population no voice in government and severely punished any expressions of discontentment with the status quo” (Pipes, 18). In order to rule such a system effectively, it would require an autocrat not only in name but in personality, “someone who enjoyed the prerogatives of power and knew how…

Words 1113 - Pages 5

Why did Tsarist regime collapsed un 1917 Essay

Russian Revolutions in1917, which take us back to 1905, are vast and diverse. For centuries,oppressive and autovratic tsars ruled the country, while most of the Russiancitizens managed to survive under dreadful economic and social conditions.Several political movements, which were created during the 19th and early20th century, aimed at dethrowing the repressive Tsar, Nicholas the II. Theembarrassing string of defeats in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-1905 and theRussia’s badly organized and unsuccessful…

Words 639 - Pages 3

Nicolas Ii Downfall Oct Halfterm Essay

1 December y How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? Tsar Nicholas was to a great extent responsible for his own downfall, the main factor being his decision to take over as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces during World War One. Russia was economically and socially ill-prepared for war and the effects and the outcome of the war had a devastating impact upon the Russian people. There had been a continual build-up of discontent towards the Tsar as a result of Russia’s failure…

Words 2710 - Pages 11