Essay about Tsar: Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Nicholas

Submitted By Myrella97
Words: 707
Pages: 3
Open Document
Russia was facing many crises in the early 20th century. Russia wasn’t very industrialized and had a weak transportation system because they were an agricultural society. Russia was a poor agrarian society and they opposed nationalism because they were multi-ethnic. The Tsar of Russia was Nicholas II, who was married to Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. Tsar had many challenges towards his power that have happened throughout history including protests. Tsar depended on his army to keep his power. The Tsarist government of Russia faced serious dangers from 1900 to the outbreak of war in 1914 because of the citizens unrest, the political influences that challenged Tsar, and economic unrest in Russia which came from wars. On January 22, 1905, Father Gapon led many other unarmed, peaceful demonstrators to present a petition to the Tsar Nicholas II. The protesters were singing patriotic songs including the saying, “God save the Tsar!” The demonstrators were fired upon by soldiers of the Imperial Guard, which was called Bloody Sunday that is usually known as the start of the fighting in the revolution. The Tsar wasn’t at the Winter Palace nor the city but he received the blame for the deaths, which resulted in anger towards him. The Revolutions of 1905 began on January 22nd of 1905 which was directed towards the government. The Revolutions of 1905 included the peasants, industrial workers and many others which led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and the Duma. The boyars were willing to work with Tsar as a constitutional monarchy to avoid socialists and marxists; they boyars didn’t rebel because their number was so small. The Revolutions of 1905 resulted in the revolutionaries being defeated and Nicholas II keeping the throne.
On February 17, 1905, Tsar published the Bulygin Rescript that promised the formation of a consultative assembly, freedom of speech and religious tolerance. The following day, Tsar Nicholas II agreed to create the Duma but with only consultative powers. Sergei Witte had doubled the size of the railroad and encouraged western investments. The October Manifesto, which was written by Sergei Witte, demanded Tsar to grant civil rights and giving the Duma the central legislative power. Finally, Tsar signed it on October 30th. He signed it because it would end the revolution and kept him in power for 12 more years because he feared losing his throne. The Constitution in 1906 formed 2 chambers, the Duma and a reformed State Council. The Duma was elected for a period of 5 years. Women and nearly half of male workers weren’t allowed to vote. The State Council was mostly made up of men appointed by the Tsar because he
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Tsar: Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Nicholas

Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Essay

Written by Tsar Nicholas himself, Source B showcases an extract from the October Manifesto, implemented in the year 1905. It outlines both the rules and changes the Tsar promised to enforce within that year. With the perspective of the source being from Tsar Nicholas, it hence proves to have a more bias and persuasive perspective. Being from the person directly linked to the source, it seeks to persuade the reader of the changes for the future whilst also providing factual information. Source B is…

Words 364 - Pages 2

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? Essay

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? 1917 saw the February revolution, the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of 300 years of Romanov rule and centuries of a Tsarist regime ruling Russia. The reasons why Nicholas II was forced to abdicate can be explained in terms of beliefs, such as Nicholas II belief in autocracy, circumstances, such as world war one, and actions, such as Nicholas’ decision to take direct control of the armed forces. In this essay I will be arguing that circumstances…

Words 1449 - Pages 6

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

turn of the twentieth century saw Tsar Nicholas' reign over Russia from the years of 1894-1917 fall at the hands of the Romanovs, causing the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. There were numerous factors that contributed to the decline of the autocracy, led by Tsar Nicholas II. Nicholas' resistance to creating change caused many problems for Russian society. The Tsar refused to take advice from others as he believed it posed a threat to his authority, which the Tsar feared to a great extent. The October…

Words 821 - Pages 4

Tsar Essay

Tsar Nicholas II The Tsar crowned as supreme ruler of Russia was in need of a new face, so in 1894 a new Tsar was crowned. Nicholas II became the new Tsar of Russia and was praised by many peasants upon his crowning, often referred to as ‘The Little Father of Russia’ he was seen as the saviour of the country but later throughout his reign he would be seen as a weak leader and a failure to the people. His upbringing would cause him to not agree with the necessary change and reform that the people…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

February Revolution Essay examples

international scene as the February Revolution in Russia. As far as outcomes are concerned, the end of Tsardom as one of them, historians are quite in agreement. However, there is a strong division between those who believe that the Great War (1914-1918) destroyed Tsarism or merely accelerated its destruction. Some historians argue that the war was the primary reason for the Tsar’s downfall. Steve Smith (2002), believes, with an optimist’s perspective, that by 1914 Russia was beginning a slow process of Westernisation…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

Russian Revolution Research Paper

Czar Nicholas II Czar Nicholas II came to power in 1894. He believed in his father, Alexander III’s, belief that absolute power of the tsars should be preserved. However Nicholas II lacked the vision and responsibility required of a leader. Nicholas II allowed many of his decisions to be heavily controlled by his wife, Alexandra, and a peasant named Rasputin. Rasputin was able to stop their hemophiliac son from bleeding so Alexandra and Nicholas trusted everything Rasputin said. Also, Tsar Nicholas…

Words 1824 - Pages 8

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

The development of opposition to the Romanov Dynasty before 1914 was a build-up over time of the Romanov Dynasty and Tsar Nicholas II’s rule. It was a build-up of tension and repression amongst the Russian people. Russia at the time was made mostly of peasants living in poverty, and made up 80% of the population of Russia and only had 20% of the nation’s wealth. The nobility and Tsar’s family had most of the nation’s wealth. The Tsar’s family and nobility, including the Orthodox church, shared a…

Words 1697 - Pages 7

Russia's Autocracy In Russia

At the turn of the twentieth century, Russia remained one of the few countries in the world under autocratic rule. This meant that the Tsar held almost unlimited authority over the country, and “granted the population no voice in government and severely punished any expressions of discontentment with the status quo” (Pipes, 18). In order to rule such a system effectively, it would require an autocrat not only in name but in personality, “someone who enjoyed the prerogatives of power and knew how…

Words 1113 - Pages 5

Essay On Romanov

History Research Essay - Fall of the Romanov Dynasty To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty in 1917? What other factors led to the collapse of the regime? Nicholas Romanov was appointed the Tsar of Russia in 1894 at the age of 26. He was thrust into the role after his father died prematurely at age 49. Nicholas was ill prepared to run such a vast country, especially during a time of such huge industrial change and modernisation. He was trained as a soldier…

Words 1762 - Pages 8

Nicolas Ii Downfall Oct Halfterm Essay

1 December y How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? Tsar Nicholas was to a great extent responsible for his own downfall, the main factor being his decision to take over as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces during World War One. Russia was economically and socially ill-prepared for war and the effects and the outcome of the war had a devastating impact upon the Russian people. There had been a continual build-up of discontent towards the Tsar as a result of Russia’s failure…

Words 2710 - Pages 11