However, its greatest impact definitely falls on the educational institution. The reason that this is true is because the students are not able to learn and comprehend at a rate that is synonymous with their own comprehension and the teachers are not able to teach in a way that is most comfortable and effect for them. Instead of being taught all areas of education they are being taught test taking skills and only information that is known to be on the standardized exams. This is also negatively affecting teachers because they cannot teach the material the same way they have been because they have to teach test taking skills in certain areas and the pressure to teach information that is guaranteed to be on the exam oftentimes leaves out information that is still important despite not being on the standardized exams. Abby Jackson’s article on the failures of No Child Left Behind supports these ideas about the negative effects of high-stakes testing stating that teachers and students are handcuffed by the policy (Jackson). There are different opinions and views on this social policy, both good and bad, throughout each of the different …show more content…
They would explain No Child Left Behind as a negative policy for the society due to the inequality of different social classes. Upper social classes would have more of an advantage because of the living situations where middle and lower class would not have any advantages because they would lack the necessities to succeed during tests/ academics.
An interactionist is someone that develops their beliefs, identities and values according to individual and small group interactions. Therefore an interactionist would explain this policy as either negative or positive, which ever their peers or small group decide for this policy. They would base their thoughts on the thoughts and ideas of their