The government should have no control on decisions as personal as having children. …show more content…
According to Dr. Terri Apter, a child psychologist, “Siblings know you better than anyone.” A sibling can be very powerful and influencing for a child; the government should not have control on whether a child should have a sibling or not. According to the article “The Importance of Siblings” by Psychologies “. . .93 percent of the men who were thriving at 65 had been close to a sibling in their early life,” and “. . . poorer relationships with siblings before the age 20 could be a predictor of depression later in life, suggesting that the longer we can sustain close sibling relationships in adulthood, the more it can benefit and protect us emotionally.” Who is the government to rob a child of an experience that can only happen if a couple has more than one …show more content…
But the one-child legislation, in fact, may not actually be the best thing for the population. There are plenty more options to decrease the size of the population than just controlling the number of children. According to the article “How to Stop Population Growth Humanely”, we can control the population by “Guaranteeing education through secondary school for all. . . Eradicating gender bias from law. . . Integrating lessons on population, environment, and development into school curricula at multiple