Who truly has ownership of your body? In most arguments, the answer is simple and clear; the body is owned by the mind and soul that dwells within it. In the case of Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS), the answer can be drastically different. PAS is an extremely emotional and controversial topic, raising multitudes of ethical and legal concerns. Should terminally ill (a life expectancy of six months or less) individuals have the right to choose when and how to end their own lives? In my opinion, the answer seems an unequivocal "yes."
Ethical issue-the benefits to physician- assisted suicide
In 1998, Oregon became the first U.S state to pass the Death with Dignity Act; allowing (PAS). This act permits a competent adult with a confirmed prognosis of six months or less to live, to request a lethal dose of medication to voluntarily end their own lives. Since the Death with Dignity Act passed in Oregon in 1998, it is now legal in five other states: Washington, Vermont, Colorado, California, Montana, and Washington DC. The tremendous advances in health care over the past five decades have benefited society in numerous ways. One of the most significant is the ability to …show more content…
The act of dying is very personal; some are willing to suffer with grace until the end, while others would prefer to circumvent their suffering and make this choice for themselves. The oath physicians take is to “Do No Harm,” but in the cases of the terminally ill, what constitutes “harm” can be painfully subjective. Another human being authorized to sentence you to grimly endure the physical, psychological and emotional tragedy that is a certain (and often painful) death, strikes me as infinitely more harmful than allowing these individuals to choose the time, place and way to end their own