In the situation, the information the commander sends is that the squad should make it look like they were just returning fire. The commander is clearly passing information that I and the squad can understand. The information is also relevant to the squad’s situation since innocent civilians were killed. The inference is that it is acceptable to return fire if the enemy opens fire. The commander’s assumption is that, if the squad reports that they actually returned fire, the administration and the public will not ask questions or suspect any foul play. As a soldier. I would first consider the whole squads’ reaction to the matter. In most cases, the squad is expected to be loyal to the commander and do what is asked.
As a soldier, I would try to make it look like the squad returned fire after careful consideration on the consequences of the truth getting out to the superiors and the public. The public especially the human rights activists may go on strike …show more content…
The information he provides is precise since he explains that he plans to use it for medication purposes. As a good partner, I am expected to have my partners back and even trust him with my life. As a new officer, I would consider my experienced partners’ plea as I would still like to learn how things are done around and how to get good rankings. Therefore, I would consider helping him out given the consequences he is having at home. The problem in this situation is, I can’t return the confiscated marijuana to the offender and I would have to decide whether to ignore my partners request and chronical the bust. I would ask him to take the marijuana and give the offender a warning. The consequences of not recording the bust would be getting caught causing damage to our reputation. This would be unlikely since the offender is not charged but given a