The basis of a strong system for communism to flourish would require a complete restructuring of government , which would need ¨not simply take over the state machine,utterly smash it and build its own organs of class rule, based on proletarian democracy¨ (Blunden). This can’t be so easily achieved in modern day society because of the chain of reliance in which other economies rely on each other for trade and such, leaving them to crumble if a country is going through a revolution. However looking at middle ages, they had the advantage of having ¨ a decentralized kingdom, the monarch's power is limited by the strength of local lords, who have significant autonomy (even though they are officially subject to the monarch's rule)¨ (Feudalism and Serfdom). With a decentralized kingdom that means that wealth is limited to the lord of the region and other regions aren’t as affected if they are bankrupt. So in the event of a coup, there is a gradual assimilation through a complete takeover of a region and placement of communist leader who will enforce those ideals. That is where the Robin Hood figure comes in, because not just anyone can step into power and maintain the system. In communism there are two main branches theoretical and practical (Blunden). Practical …show more content…
During the Vietnam war and Cold War there was a lot of hostility associated with the mere mention of communism. The very point of the those wars was to guarantee that communism would not spread to other countries (History). President Eisenhower created a theory called the Domino Effect where he theorized if Vietnam fell to communism, then countries like China and Laos would be next (History). This put communism in a metaphor that made them sound like a plague on man. The irony is ¨Marx and Engels hoped the factory workers of Europe would get together and seize control of a large part of the continent, end capitalism and it’s injustices¨(Kort). So in the end, Marx did want his ideas to spread. The fact that it spread that much should be attributed to Engels and his geniuses. Though this was a dream that was never came to complete fruition, it is a shame because ¨Marxism shares with other progressive social movements an uncompromising hostility to all forms of domination — sexism, racism, and so on,¨ (Blunden). Communism is all about equality for all, it does not try to put people down others (Blunden). As said by Antonina Berezhnaya a ¨ chief refractory engineer¨ in the Soviet Union: ¨ One of the more revolutionary aspects of Soviet communism was that it promised to liberate man and woman from sexist shackles of the bourgeois middle-class mentality¨ (Berezhnaya as seen in Life Under Soviet