Pros And Cons Of Anti Federalists

Words: 454
Pages: 2
Open Document
Evi Vayts

Anti Federalists- People who fought against the Constitution.
Leaders- Mason, Randolph, Gerry, Hancock, Adams, Lee, Henry, and Warren.

Arguments:
Previous republican governments had been in small communities where people were of about equal wealth and had the same values. They were all focused on common welfare, not at all how this more large and diverse nation would think or act.

This type of free government needs active participation by the people, and the people would not all be close enough to the center of government to participate. The only way to force them to take part is by military force which is tyranny.

The Constitution grants the national government too much power over the state governments. Eventually, all of …show more content…
Civic virtue was not enough to keep them from not living for the common welfare. If there is a large republic, all of the divided powers between state and national government would prevent these groups from overthrowing the government.

The rights of the people would be protected very well by the government, so the people will trust the government. There would be no tyranny because the checks and balances and separation of powers are put into place.

The extra powers that are given to the national government are for issues like trade, currency, and defense. These can only be handled by a strong national government. Also, the Constitution has protections for state governments so that the national government won’t overpower them.

The necessary and proper and general welfare clauses are essential for the national government. If it wants to do what the national government is responsible for doing, these clauses need to be put into place.

An executive branch that is strong is needed for the national government to do it’s responsibilities. The three national powers are separated and checked by one another so that the other branches won’t be
Show More

Related Documents: Pros And Cons Of Anti Federalists

Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

The Anti-Federalists were a group of diverse individuals who formed together to oppose the passage of the Constitution back in 1787. They were all in agreement by their fear of a potentially oppressive and powerful national government. The government at the time was dominated by wealthy aristocrats. The absence of a bill of rights in the new Constitution was a major sign of danger for them. Some states, such as North Carolina, prohibited ratifying the Constitution until a bill of rights was included…

Words 499 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

would be an Anti-Federalist, because of the fact that they didn't hate federalism, they just wanted to make improvements. They worked to give more power to the states. As an Anti-Federalist, I agree with the constitution but the bill of rights that was added later on is indeed essential. The bill of rights is a huge part in our personal rights that we are allowed to have, day after day. I don't know what our country would be like if we didn’t have these rights in place. The anti-federalists, despite…

Words 631 - Pages 3

Essay about History: State Thomas Jefferson

Randolph -Hamiltons’s plan for the debt=high tariffs, Assumption of the US, fed. gov’t assume state debt, this plan opposed by Alexander Hamilton; fear that AH’s plan was bad for farmers & the South, led to first official political parties: Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans -Jefferson (D-Rs) believed in a strict construction of the Constitution (the gov’t cannot do anything unless the law says it can), Hamilton (Feds) believed in a Loose construction (the gov’t can do anything unless the…

Words 1569 - Pages 7

Legalization Marijuana Essay

1. Differences in political philosophy I. Federalists: (Democrats) Believed in the need for a strong central government. Believed that the central government would protect the citizens in a way that the states couldn’t or wouldn’t. Thought that this was the only way to create a country rather than just 13 states. II. Anti-Federalists: (Republicans) Thought most power must remain with the States. Feared tyranny like the British Monarchy would result from a strong central government. Said if they…

Words 3988 - Pages 16

Ap Gov Review

compromise between Antifederalists and Federalists guaranteed the addition of 10 amendments that would protect individual freedoms and rights; ratified in 1791. Federalists Anti-Federalists Supported U.S. Constitution Opposed Constitution - Large landowners, wealthy -Weak state govs, strong nat. gov -Indirect election -government by elite -small farmers, laborers -strong state gov, weak nat. gov -direct election of officials -rule by common man Federalist Papers #10- written by Alexander…

Words 3457 - Pages 14