When he wants to describe the time period the woman needed to look at her phone, he uses the word “glanced” (Hosansky). The author warns the audience that even a very short period of time can be the difference between life and death. He proceeds using effective words to convince the audience that texting while driving endangers them. He describes the sender of the message as a friend of the woman. A friend who almost was the reason for a sad car accident and probably with casualties. After the woman looks back at the road and sees the problem, Hosansky describes her reaction and says that she swerved into the next lane without looking (Hosansky). The last thing a driver would want is to swerve while driving. Hosansky starts his next sentence with “Fortunately, there was no car in the way” (Hosansky). The author believes that when something happens while texting and driving, the possibility of staying alive and safe might depends on fortune. This idea warns the audience and alerts them, because such doubtable thing like fortune makes no …show more content…
This time, Hosansky focuses on driving more than texting. He seems as a big fan of Google’s new self-driving smart cars, and lists several features for this technology that can help in the issue of texting while driving. Again, he uses word choice as an effective strategy to convince the audience that there are existing solutions for texting while driving. “Crash-avoidance” and “Vehicle-to-vehicle communications” (Hosansky) are the two main points in his