Roe V. Wade Summary

Words: 1183
Pages: 5
Open Document
Today, when addressing the topic of women’s rights the ruling of the United States Supreme Court Case Roe v. Wade is typically front and center. This landmark case has become a pillar for many court decisions and changes in several state legislations. This case deals with the legality of abortion as a right and not a medical necessity. In 1970 Norma McCorvey also known as Jane Roe filed a class action law suit against the Dallas County district attorney Henry Wade in Texas (CNN, 2017). At the time McCorvey filed for the law suit she was pregnant and wanted to abort her pregnancy. However, under the Texas State Penal Code Articles 1191-4 and 1196 it was illegal to preform or receive an abortion unless it was medically necessary to save the …show more content…
The Doe’s complaint only brought forth the possibilities that Mrs. Doe could become pregnant or experience contraceptive failure. Therefore, their complaint was dismissed by the Supreme Court (Cornell University Law School, 1992). As for Dr. Hallford his case was too dismissed after review by the Supreme Court. Dr, Hallford was in search of a declaratory and injunctive relief. His claim of what rights were in violation were also that of his pending prosecution. The Supreme Court concluded the District Court was right not to grant injunctive relief to Dr. Hallfor. However, they were in error when they granting Hallford a declaratory relief and reversed the court decision, ultimately dismissing his complaint. Furthermore, the Supreme Court agreed along with the District Court that Roe had grounds for the present litigation. Her case was not moot and was granted declaratory relief (Cornell University Law School, 1992). Overall, the final decision of Roe v. Wade took three years of litigation from 1970 to 1973. The U.S Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision that agreed that women to have the right to an abortion (U.S. History, 2016). They ruled it protected under Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment as it was infringement to one’s right to privacy (CNN, 2017). The court’s ruling gave women the right to abort the pregnancy at any time. However, the state may have regulations regarding the second and third trimesters …show more content…
The only thing I can say is that I can see where they came from, and the logic of the “mother’s” rights. I also can see where an abortion maybe appropriate in case where life of the mother is in danger and in cases of rape. I would also like to point out that Abortion is a clear example of separation of church and state. However, due to my moral and religious beliefs I cannot condone abortion just because someone does not want to have a child. I believe that all life has intrinsic value and is worth fighting for even if that life is in early stages of development, pregnancy. In my opinion, if a person does not want to have a child then there are plenty of contraceptive available. There is a huge difference in the prevention of pregnancy verse aborting a pregnancy after conception. Preventing a pregnancy is as simple is preventing a pregnancy, but aborting a pregnancy after conception is ending a life that has already begun. Abortion should never be taken lightly it is ending a human life that just got stated, and to end that because the mother was not ready is selfish. Moreover, in cases where the mother just simply does not want the child, news flash it takes two people to become pregnant, and I think that both should have a say in whether or not the child has the chance to live. If both parents have parental rights after it is born than both parents should have a voice in
Show More

Related Documents: Roe V. Wade Summary

Roe V. Wade Summary

constitutional right is under Roe v. Wade. The case began on March of 1970 in Texas when Jane Roe an unmarried pregnant woman challenged the state of Texas’s anti-abortion law, by stating that the laws are vague and did not follow the ninth and fourteenth amendments of the Constitution. At the time of her case she was pregnant and the final decision from the case was not made until after her baby was born and adopted by another individual. Her suit was fought against Henry Wade who enforced the state’s…

Words 834 - Pages 4

Summary Of The Roe V. Wade Case Against Abortion

In 1973 the court ruled that laws banning abortion were unconstitutional during the Roe vs. Wade case, now four decades later the anti-abortion agenda threatens the remove women’s constitutional right to privacy. Abortion is a right guaranteed by the constitution and tested against the court of law. Women have the right to decide what to do with her own body; her life is more important than the fetus that she carries.…

Words 71 - Pages 1

Roe Vs Wade Summary

Name: Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). This case dealt with the issues of allowing or restricting abortions. II. Summary of Facts: Jane Roe, a Texas resident, wanted to terminate her pregnancy. However, Article 1196 of the Texas Penal Code restricted the use of abortions to circumstances when “procured or attempted by medical advice for the purposes of saving the life of the mother.” She claimed the statute unconstitutionally restricted her right to an abortion, Roe sued Henry Wade, a Texas…

Words 494 - Pages 2

Procedural Vs Substantive Due Process

Griswold v. Connecticut the right to privacy was determined when the courts said the use of birth control by a legally married couple fell under the couples right to privacy because of the first, third, fourth, fifth and ninth amendments. And although despite history saying that birth control is criminalized through the Comstock Act it would no longer fall under this law. The right to privacy in regards to the case Roe v. Wade is probably the most controversial case in history to this day. Roe v Wade…

Words 1019 - Pages 5

Griswold Vs Jackson Right To Privacy

Freedom of Religion. There are certain cases that prove this right, such as situations from birth control to wiretapping. The topic Right to Privacy is something many people take seriously Examples of these cases would be Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe v. Wade, and Dobbs v. Jackson. Privacy is something that most people feel is important. They feel as if they should have a right to, and yet the Constitution never uses the word privacy. Many are concerned if they have a right to privacy. Privacy is an…

Words 1872 - Pages 8

The Fight For A Choice: The Roe V. Wade Case

The Fight for a Choice In 1973, the Roe v. Wade case was resolved. Norma McCorvey, also known as Jane Roe, went against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County. The Supreme Court eventually affirmed that abortions were legal in the United States. Although it was a game changer for the pro-life and pro-choice debate, abortion is still banned in several states. Because a woman should be able to make her own decisions about her body, abortion should be kept legal in the United States.…

Words 836 - Pages 4

Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities Essay

ethical issue since long before the laws began to have a say. When abortion was legalized in 1973, after the resolution of the Roe v. Wade case, states were no longer allowed to keep their laws prohibiting abortion and women were given the choice whether to continue a pregnancy or not. However, as time has passed, some states are beginning to revert back to the pre-Roe v. Wade times and make abortion a virtually impossible task. During the first trimester and briefly into the second, a woman has a choice…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Argument Against Abortion

Abortions Should Remain Legal For so many decades, abortion has been performed and carried out for over thousands of years. According from the summary gathered from Wikipedia, It was first started for the fear among the “native” Anglo-Saxon women. They believed that the population would be dominated by the children of the incoming immigrants, who had higher birth rates at the time. In the early and late 1800s, many states began legalizing abortion but antiseptics were unfamiliar, hospitals…

Words 1686 - Pages 7

Samuel Alito Supreme Court Justice Paper Moot Court

If a woman wants to be free of the burdens of pregnancy, that interest does not disappear the moment the viability line is crossed. Isn’t that right?” (Alito, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization). He argues against the viability line, highlighting the fact that a woman who is not yet at “viability” nonetheless wants to end her pregnancy both before and after the line has been crossed. So, is it truly unconstitutional…

Words 2886 - Pages 12

POL330 Midterm#1 Essay

Minor v. Happerset [Holding: The Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee women the right to vote.] [overruled by Amendment 19th, 1920] [summary: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 1Si (1875), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Supreme Court upheld state court decisions in Missouri, which had refused to register a woman as a lawful voter because that state's laws allowed only men to vote. The Minor v. Happersett…

Words 3008 - Pages 13