It is also to determine whether the Catholic Church has actually decided on a form of government that would be best in ensuring that social justice is protected. This could be the most important question since many believe that the Church is overly friendly to a socialistic form of government when that could be the worst choice for the delivery of social justice (Suprenant, 2013). As one author points out the catholic tradition in its views on social justice have been stolen by others for pearly political purposes (Suprenant, 2013). He goes on to point out that the term Catholicism is now almost synonymous with social justice. So the views of the Catholic Church are being used by the political left to advance its agenda. This could well explain why the government in so many instances promote social justice within the catholic sense that it the same time the government promotes many issues that the Catholic Church finds reprehensible. But the Catholic Church mainly sets by continues its association with these individuals and organizations within the government. The Catholic Church has been used and it should realize this. One statement made by the author Dorothy Day was that production determines needs (Day, 1972). One of the first things you learn in economics is that it is normally the demands of the people that determine what is made. Then the author continues with the common phrase “from each according to his ability and to each according to his needs”. There’s certainly a wide variation in the abilities of many different people. Similarly there are vast differences and the needs of many people. Social justice according to the catholic tradition requires that the basic needs of humans such as food, health and dignity be met. But at this point the author has no government prescription for meeting these needs. The author also referred to G. K. Chesterton’s call for a distributive form of economic society. This puts the ownership of as much of the factors of production into the hands of many people as possible. Since all income and comes back to the factors of production which include land, labor and capital, this would certainly help increase the incomes of a great many people. To When reading this author one expects her surely be an advocate for some type of