In the analogy, one is asked to imagine finding a watch on the beach. One would naturally assume that the watch was created by a watchmaker and did not evolve naturally. Like the watch, the universe is complex and intricate; therefore, as the analogy goes, the universe must also have a creator (2011b). This argument/analogy suffers from four particular flaws: (1) our ability to recognize design depends upon our ability to differentiate between objects not found in nature. We don’t look for a watchmaker when we see a rat, for instance, because we know that rats are “produced through the well-understood natural processes of mammalian reproduction” (2011b). Nature itself is essentially excluded from producing proof of design; (2) if a complex, intricate, and highly ordered universe is so unlikely, then surely a being capable of creating such a universe is infinitely more complex and unlikely. This begs the question of “Who created the Creator?”; (3) the analogy is weak because a watchmaker makes watches from smaller, pre-existing materials, while God is often purported to have created the universe from nothing; and (4) this analogy works better as proof for a multitude of gods rather than the monotheistic 4-O god it is intended as. A watchmaker makes watches, but if one stumbled upon a chair on that very same beach, one would not assume it was also made by the