Essay on Terror: Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Amendment

Submitted By tcpjets2
Words: 2981
Pages: 12
Open Document
Lundquist & Massey, Politics or Economics? (HuskyCT) Journal #5: What is a push factor according to Lundquist and
Massey?
Paived roads, political stability, economy, social…,capital, sympathetic of migrants from Nicaragua because of political ties

Journal #6: Explain the Supreme Court’s decision to deny Verdugo-Urquidez the right to a 4th Amendment? Should aliens kidnapped by U.S. authority be entitled to the 4th Amendment? The supreme court decided held that the “Fourth amendment does not apply to the search and seizure by United States agents of property owned by a nonresident alien and located in a foreign country.” Many in the court believe that there is no legal use of a search warrant if it is being used outside of U.S. borders. A US magistrate simply does not have the legal power to authorize such a warrant. The court felt that the fourth amendment secured only the members of the US community (“the people”). They don't consider Uraquidez to have a legitimate connection to this country. Thus, Uraquidez is not a part of “the people” and should only be afforded fifth and Sixth Amendment rights for criminal procedures. They held that the framers of the constitution designed the fourth amendment with no connections to aliens residing outside US borders. The federal governments actions shouldn't be restrained by the fourth amendment when conducting foreign operations. Aliens that are kidnapped by us authority should be entitled to the fourth amendment. The dissent believed that Uraquidez would have a fourth amendment worthy connection to this country for he was placed, “among those governed by federal criminal laws and investigating him for violations of those laws.” It would only make sense that the laws of the country that he initially broke them in would be used in his criminal judgment. Another view spoke about the significance for obtaining a search warrant in all investigating procedures. The warrant assures that investigating officers wont consider the land beyond US borders as the lawless Wild West. “As a matter of United States constitutional law, a warrant serves the same primary function overseas as it does domestically: it assures that a neutral magistrate has authorized the search and limited its scope. The need to protect those suspected of criminal activity from the unbridled discretion of investigating officers is no less important abroad than at home.” I believe that fourth amendment rights should protect every human. Federal officers cannot have the power to initiate raids without receiving legal authorization. When every person isn’t believed to have equal protection an enormous grey area is created. That grey area has consisted of the kidnapping, torturing, and murdering of innocent people.
The court held that the text, “the people” meant that the fourth amendment only protected a specific class of individuals. The dissent states that, “Throughout that entire drafting process, no speaker or commentator, pro or con, referred to the term "the people" as a limitation. “The People” refers to every person on earth.

given protection Nor is the Warrant Clause inapplicable merely because a warrant from a United States magistrate could not "author- ize" a search in a foreign country. Although this may be true as a matter of international law, it is irrelevant to our interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. As a matter of United States constitutional law, a warrant serves the same primary function overseas as it does domestically: it assures that a neutral magistrate has authorized the search and lim- ited its scope. The need to protect those suspected of crim- inal activity from the unbridled discretion of investigating officers is no less important abroad than at home.14

The conditions and considerations of this case would make adherence to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement impracticable and anomalous. Just as the
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Terror: Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Amendment

Essay On The Fourth Amendment

breaches the privacy of citizens. Specifically, opponents of the undertaking argue surveillance breaches the fourth amendment as entrenched in the bill of rights. Notwithstanding, a keen inquiry into the motives of…

Words 696 - Pages 3

FISA Pros And Cons

The Constitution of the United States was drafted in 1787 by our Founding Fathers and has been abided by ever since; its first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, are an assurance provided to the population of America to ensure the protection of people’s rights under the power of the federal government. We fool ourselves into believing that our rights were protected back then and we continue to fool ourselves by believing our rights are protected now. The federal government has been lying to our…

Words 1793 - Pages 8

Essay about The Fourth Amendmet

American Government The Fourth Amendmet March 21, 2011 Amendment Number IV Amendment number IV was added to Constitution of the United States on December 15, 1791. This amendment gives the people of the United States protection from government agencies and other agencies from entering or searching their homes, and their own private property without a search warrant. Search warrants are obtained by a government official, in most cases a detective…

Words 2301 - Pages 10

Habeas Corpus and Civil Liberties Essay

these civil liberties is free speech the first Amendment protects this right to free speech and expression. Although all of our rights have their restrictions the point is we should be grateful to have them. Because many countries are subject to their countries unfair laws and also unfair taxes just to name a few. A prime example of when freedom of speech can be threatened is when it is considered harmful to others. “In its 1919 Schenck v. United States ruling, the Supreme Court addressed a free…

Words 1633 - Pages 7

Usa-Patriot Act 9/11 Summary

overviews the USA-Patriot Act, the 9/11 Commission Report, National Security Letters, The Attorney General FBI Guidelines, the Homeland Security, and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. This reading shows the errors of the U.S. in terror situations as well as the conflict between the executive and legislative branches of the government. Learned from this reading is cooperation between agencies that may have prevented incidents, a better understanding of the law, and more teamwork…

Words 1254 - Pages 6

Foundations Of American Government

a plant of rapid growth." -George Washington The Declaration of Independence The U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights The Enlightenment and Political Philosophy Expected Outcomes To understand the philosophical principles behind the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and how these principles influence the structure and process of government. Overview The United States, as a nation, was born of the American Revolution of 1776. This revolution cut the political ties…

Words 7246 - Pages 29

National Security Agency Analysis

interviews with Snowden and Greenwald. This information has generated a lot of talk between not only citizens of the United States but all around the world. The information on the NSA has been taken in many different…

Words 1347 - Pages 6

Essay Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror POL201 Instructor Looney 5/31/2014 When an individual is imprisoned they have the right to be brought before a judge to have their case analyzed to determine whether their detained status will be permanent or temporary. This right is called a writ of habeas corpus and it was created in the English legal system, it has now expanded to many nations (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia.2014). A writ of habeas corpus ensures…

Words 1992 - Pages 8

Civil Liberties And The War On Terrorism

Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus. Additionally, dissidents were imprisoned for criticizing the way the government was fighting the war. There is no evidence that this aided the fighting of the Civil War in any way. Ultimately, the United States Supreme Court declared unconstitutional Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.2 During World War I, the government aggressively prosecuted critics of the war. One man went to jail for ten years for circulating a leaflet arguing that…

Words 8949 - Pages 36

Term Paper

on this nation’s government, security and people. The incensed citizens of this country demanded action and as a result, several different laws were passed. The centerpiece of these laws was the USA PATRIOT Act. The Patriot Act infringes the Constitution by lifting restraints on governmental interference on its citizens’ privacy and should have never been signed into law. 9/11 led to the passing of laws that violate the civil liberties of the people in this country. When discussing the Patriot…

Words 2341 - Pages 10