Essay on The Adversary System

Submitted By Halo79
Words: 643
Pages: 3
Open Document
The Adversary System
1. The adversary system is the main system of trial in Australia where the two parties battle to win the case. There are strict rules of procedure that must be followed and the judge and the jury are impartial arbitrators.

2. In the adversary system each party has control of their own case. This is known as party control, where they get to decide how evidence is presented, providing the rules of evidence and procedure are followed, and they get to prepare their own case and present it.

In the adversary system, parties are responsible for instigating proceedings. In a civil case the plaintiff is responsible for deciding whether to go to court to sue the defender, whereas in a criminal case it’s the prosecution who decides whether to charge the accused. The parties are responsible for investigating the facts of the case (deciding what evidence to presents, witnesses to call and questions to ask) and investigating the law, which may bring forward relevant precedents. In a civil case, the parties also decide whether to have a jury and choose whether they want to have legal representation, and the quality of that legal representation.

Party control ensures that parties are responsible for the outcome of the case, have the responsibility to prepare their case and then both sides fight to win their case. Cases are heard without state interference. However, party control increases the costs involved in taking a matter to court.

3. The role of the Judge ensures that the contest is fair and impartial so that both sides have an equal chance to win. The judge decides on the admissibility of evidence, questions of law and ensures the burden of proof is discharged. The judge decides the case when there is not jury, and sentences the accused in criminal cases. The adversary system could not function of the judge was not independent and impartial. The judge cannot favour one side nor have previous knowledge of the accused or parties in a civil case.

4. The burden and standard of proof are essential elements of the adversary system. They ensure that the person bringing the matter to court has to prove their case to the required standard. In a criminal case the prosecution brings the case, and in a civil case it’s the plaintiff. The standard is the strength of proof required in the case. In criminal cases the prosecution needs to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and in civil cases the plaintiff needs to prove their case on the balance of probabilities.

5.
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on The Adversary System

Adversary System

Phillips June 26th, 2014 Adversary System The adversary system can best be described as the basis of our system. According to USlegal.com, “ this system is used across the U.S in which the parties to a case develop and present their arguments, gather and submit evidence, call and question witnesses, and, generally control the information presented according to the law and legal process, (Adversarial System Law & Legal Definition).” The basic outline of the system is that each party or side…

Words 876 - Pages 4

Air Force Supply Chain Analysis

information systems. It applies across the range of military operations, from peace to all-out conflict. Understanding of information operations must clearly includes two conceptually distinct but extremely interconnected pillars: information-in-warfare the “gain” and “exploit” aspects or information-based processes and information warfare the “attack” and “defend” aspects. 2. Information warfare is information operations conducted to defend one’s own information and information systems or attacking…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Essay Legal: Common Law and Present Arguments

effectiveness of the Adversarial system in achieving Justice The adversarial system of trial was developed by the British in 1743 as a system of trial. The adversarial system was adopted by Australia. Australia adopted this system of trial as Britain colonised Australia in the 19th century. Britain brought with it a system of law known as ' common law' ". As the name suggests, the adversarial system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Cryptography

Generator (PKG) provides complete trust at the decryption end. Applications: This scheme finds its greatest use is in the file transfer service. 3.5. Multi-instance Security and Its Application to Password-Based Cryptography Mi-security [18] is used in systems where a single instance can be compromised and a second line of defence is provided, aiming to ensure that the effort to compromise all of some large number m of instances grows linearly with m. Advantages: Mi security is potentially much higher than…

Words 3176 - Pages 13

Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 1

\subsection{Security of KEF-MA-CP-ABE-DR Scheme}\label{ch6:sec2:sub4} We consider potential attackers in the collaborative cloud data sharing system as follows: \textbf{1)} The CA and each AA are assumed to be honest, such that each of them does not collude with any other entity. However, the CA or any AA can be corrupted by attackers, and also it should be prevented from decrypting any ciphertexts individually. \textbf{2)} The CS is assumed to be minimally trusted. It might attempt to obtain the…

Words 755 - Pages 4

Aristotle And Speedy Trial Essay

justice system and the facilities that exist within it, could our adversary system be the biggest flaw of them all? The sixth amendment guarantees a fair and speedy trial, but could that expedited process strip us from getting to the truth? In theory, having a speedy trial allows for the process to not endure for a long period of time, but there are repercussions for a trial being hastily decided. When we are seeking truth--maybe a speedy trial is not the best route. The adversary system alone has…

Words 523 - Pages 3

The Importance of Securing Sensitive Items Essay

The habits of exercising security and accountability of a soldiers items allow the soldier and their team to operate to the highest standards or have items be accessed by an opposing adversary creating loss of overall mission success. Operational security is a process that denied critical information to an adversary. If one were to obtain the information presented it could be used against friendly…

Words 865 - Pages 4

American Ourt System Essay

American Court System Eva McGill CJA /224 5/21/13 Danielle Diaz The United States courts and history and its purpose has been a strong order of justice in the nation since the first time it was established. The system was designed to allow the citizens of the United States to receive a fair criminal trial regardless of social status, gender, race, and ethnic background. The Court .A court is an institution that the government sets up to settle disputes through a legal process. Courts decide…

Words 765 - Pages 4

LAW100 Week 2 Essay

PRESENTATION NAME Re-cap from last week Sources of law Alternative methods to courts • Alternative methods of dispute settlement have grown in the last few years because of the delays, costs, ignorance and intimidation of the traditional court system. – These include • tribunals; • ombudsmen; and • alternative dispute resolution. Alternative methods to courts Alternative methods to courts Judicial and quasi-judicial tribunals – Designed to provide cheap, quick and fair dispute resolution…

Words 644 - Pages 3

Summary: Rape And The Culture Of The Courtroom

Rape and the Culture of the Courtroom explores the idea that the adversary system here in the United States reflects male expectations about justice and gender. Andrew Taslitz examines how cultural narratives shape trial outcomes, analyzes aspects of rape trials that have historically put women at a disadvantage when they are the victims, and finishes with historical commentary showing the reader how the reform suggested by Taslitz fits into the history of rape law reform. Taslitz does a fantastic…

Words 138 - Pages 1