Thesis The articles of government back in 1787 were not really working out too well, and the thing that was making it ineffective threatened to challenge any attempts at new government. This was the resulting issue of competing interest between the different states, the states with larger populations versus the smaller ones. So a state with a large population, say Virginia, had different needs that a state with a lesser population like Delaware for example. So that the large states are the ones that really benefit from government …show more content…
The Chief Executive (president, chosen by the legislature), Legislature Bicameral, and the Judicial Branch (court system).
II. The New Jersey Plan
a) Delegates from Delaware, New Jersey, Rhode Island and other small states at the time immediately objected to the given Virginia Plan, feeling cheated out by their larger populations getting the better end of the deal. The smaller states preferred to have something more like the Confederation System, in which all of the states were represented equally.
b) Delegates that were not pleased with the mentioned Virginia Plan stood with a man called William Paterson of New Jersey. On the 15th of June he proposed a different plan that then were to revise the Articles of Confederation.
c) The New Jersey plan kept the idea of the Confederation’s one house legislature, which consists of a vote from each state to be more equal to the states with fewer representatives than and not as high as a population. Yet congress could regulate the trade and set taxes, powers that it did not have under the Articles of Confederation. Congress would then elect a sort of weak executive branch containing more than one