The Importance Of Evidence In Literature

Submitted By amritagill456
Words: 1062
Pages: 5
Open Document
Writing
EN1001M – Introduction to Literary Study
Introduction
Many papers that you write in college will require you to make an argument; this means that you must take a position on the subject you are discussing and support that position with evidence. It’s important that you use the right kind of evidence, that you use it effectively, and that you have an appropriate amount of it.
Comments like “for example?,” “substantiate,” “proof?,” “go deeper,” or “expand” in the margins of your graded paper suggest that you may need more evidence.
Using evidence in an argument
Does evidence speak for itself?
Absolutely not. After you introduce evidence into your writing, you must say why and how this evidence supports your argument. In other words, you have to explain the significance of the evidence and its function in your paper.
Here are some questions you can ask yourself about a particular bit of evidence. Answering them may help you explain how your evidence is related to your overall argument:
1. O.k., I’ve just stated this point, but so what? Why is it interesting? Why should anyone care?
2. What does this information imply?
3. What are the consequences of thinking this way or looking at a problem this way?
4. I’ve just described what something is like or how I see it, but why is it like that?
5. I’ve just said that something happens-so how does it happen? How does it come to be the way it is?
6. Why is this information important? Why does it matter?
7. How is this idea related to my thesis? What connections exist between them? Does it support my thesis? If so, how does it do that?
8. Can I give an example to illustrate this point?
Quotations
When you quote, you are reproducing another writer’s words exactly as they appear on the page. Here are some tips to help you decide when to use quotations:

Writing
1. Quote if you can’t say it any better and the author’s words are particularly brilliant, witty, edgy, distinctive, a good illustration of a point you’re making, or otherwise interesting. 2. Quote if you are using a particularly authoritative source and you need the author’s expertise to back up your point.
3. Quote if you are analyzing diction, tone, or a writer’s use of a specific word or phrase.
4. Quote if you are taking a position that relies on the reader’s understanding exactly what another writer says about the topic.
Be sure to introduce each quotation you use, and always cite your sources.
Like all pieces of evidence, a quotation can’t speak for itself. If you end a paragraph with a quotation, that may be a sign that you have neglected to discuss the importance of the quotation in terms of your argument. It’s important to avoid “plop quotations,” that is, quotations that are just dropped into your paper without any introduction, discussion, or follow-up. Paraphrasing
When you paraphrase, you take a specific section of a text and put it into your own words.
Putting it into your own words doesn’t mean just changing or rearranging a few of the author’s words: to paraphrase well and avoid plagiarism, try setting your source aside and restating the sentence or paragraph you have just read, as though you were describing it to another person. Paraphrasing is different than summary because a paraphrase focuses on a particular, fairly short bit of text (like a phrase, sentence, or paragraph). You’ll need to indicate when you are paraphrasing someone else’s text by citing your source correctly, just as you would with a quotation.
When might you want to paraphrase?
1. Paraphrase when you want to introduce a writer’s position, but his or her original words aren’t special enough to quote.
2. Paraphrase when you are supporting a particular point and need to draw on a certain place in a text that supports your point—for example, when one paragraph in a source is especially relevant.

Writing
3. Paraphrase when you want to present a writer’s view on a topic that
Show More

Related Documents: The Importance Of Evidence In Literature

Arguments: Rhetoric, Refutation And Rogerian

There are three types of arguments: Rhetoric, Refutation and Rogerian. While Rogerian might not be the winner of arguments, they are more for understanding. You can persuade, debunk, or gain understanding, depending on your position. Because politicians often use rhetoric, Rogerian arguments are more for Switzerland, and lawyers use refutation in the courtroom. So, whether you're trying to win over an audience, challenge an opponent, or foster understanding, the key lies in choosing the right argumentative…

Words 691 - Pages 3

Fareed Zakaria Rhetorical Devices

By comparing Fareed Zakaria and Richard Rodriguez’s use of rhetoric and tone, it becomes evident that, while both employ their own techniques, Zakaria’s utilization is more effective due to his use of evidence and appeals to reason. Rodriguez often relies heavily on personal anecdotes and emotional appeals, limiting his arguments. His use of rhetoric connects with people of similar upbringing; he intends his work to relate to other Spanish-speaking Americans. Through a detailed analysis of their…

Words 1138 - Pages 5

The Stain Of Racism In New York's Prisons Summary

editorial, “The Stain of Racism in New York’s Prisons,” by The Editorial Board there are uses of rhetoric, bias, and connotation. This editorial is all about the issues of racism, and some of the things that the colored inmates have to go through in a mainly white populated prison. Overall, I would say that this editorial and the arguments made are pretty much strong. In this editorial, the author uses rhetoric to help make his arguments stronger. For example, in paragraph four The Editorial Board says…

Words 638 - Pages 3

Rogerian Rhetoric Essay

Rogerian rhetoric, named after the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, is a communication and argumentative approach that emphasizes empathy, understanding, and finding common ground between differing perspectives. It diverges from traditional debate styles that often involve confrontation and attempts to "win" arguments. Instead, Rogerian rhetoric seeks to create a cooperative dialogue where both parties can express their views without feeling attacked or invalidated. In the context of education…

Words 386 - Pages 2

Plato's Use Of Rhetoric

approaches and opinions as to the uses of rhetoric and how it is ethically applied. Being such a valuable tool, scholars have debated continuously throughout time to determine the right way to use and think about rhetoric- often times having completely different stances and not budging. In this paper, we are specifically looking at three philosophers, all respected in their time and still studied today, and trying to explain their approaches to rhetoric and how they see it best used. Plato, Isocrates…

Words 661 - Pages 3

Rhetoric Reflection

the definition of “rhetoric”, which is getting people to do things. When I did the Rhetoric Analysis paper (RA), I realized the difference between knowing what rhetoric is and using the rhetoric. As I went through the drafts of the RA paper, I now have a better understanding of rhetoric. I learned that I need to first define a specific audience, and then determine the rhetoric appeals that I will use to persuade my audience. I believe the skills that I have learned about rhetoric through the process…

Words 587 - Pages 3

Rhetorical Triad And Thesis Lecture 2 3 Essay example

argumentation required proof or evidence Rhetoric: the art of persuasion Aristotle, Rhetoric, 330 BCE Develops from the observation that not all legitimate thinking takes the form of Socratic dialectic Written partly against Socrates’ claim that rhetoric is mere flattery, that only philosophy leads the way to truth Aristotle’s text introduced the basic elements of oratory, many of which we continue to recognize today in modern essay writing (arrangement, style, evidence, expression, audience, purpose)…

Words 877 - Pages 4

Aristotle And Isocrates Rhetoric

numerous approaches and opinions as to the uses of rhetoric and how it is ethically applied. Being such a valuable tool, scholars have debated continually throughout time to determine the right way to use and think about rhetoric- often times having completely different stances and not budging. In this paper, we are specifically looking at three philosophers, all respected in their time and still studied today, and trying to explain their approaches to rhetoric and how they see it best used. Plato, Isocrates…

Words 1107 - Pages 5

Rhetoric Analysis

Introduction Rhetoric is a large component of society today. While rhetoric is often met with a negative response from the public and seen as a way of tricking or manipulating an audience, this is merely a misrepresentation of the capacity and potential of rhetoric. Kenneth Burke, a 20th century rhetorical theorist, suggests a different, more positive definition of rhetoric. He says, “A rhetorician, I take it, is like one voice in a dialogue. Put several such voices together, with each voicing its…

Words 884 - Pages 4

Virginia Woolf's Rhetoric Analysis

present her writings in the traditional view as most other rhetoricians. As described in the reading, Woolf used a form called female mode of rhetoric. This form of writing did not present the argument until the end of the reading which leaves her thesis unanswered and allows the reader to pose many questions. Farrell suggests that this form is a male mode of rhetoric, but Woolf ‘s tone is not overly aggressive. I think that the way she form her writings depict the attitudes of the female as charming,…

Words 408 - Pages 2