On “The top of the Everest” and “Tales of the Odyssey” talk about their adventures, on “The top of the Everest” talk about how a girl with a group climbed to the top of the Everest with danger and difficulties. And “Tales of the Odyssey” talks about the underworld as the only place where Odysseus arrives with a specific purpose, and he does so on the advice of Circe. This essay will be about the risks and rewards of these adventures and expeditions.
On “Tales of the Odyssey” the characters faced some risks, and some of them are that in the place they found flowers, they ate but the flowers make them forget their past; And they had to face the risk …show more content…
Although there were many risks, there were also rewards. Like in “Tales of the Odyssey” they could find a place to stay after the storm. And on “The top of the Everest” she could arrive at the top, and begin on the youngest person to arrive at the top of the Everest. And there are reasons for this exploration: on “Tales of the Odyssey” was to get home to Ithaca, and on “The top of the Everest” was to arrive at the top.
Concluding this, in my opinion the text “The top of the Everest” shows and explains in a better way the risks and rewards of exploration. Because it talks about the risks they face when climbing, and the severity of them, while in "Tales of the Odyssey" he talks about the risks but not the severity of them. And it not only speaks well of the risks, but also of the rewards which are great and expresses the feeling towards them. For example, it talks about the risk of contracting hypoxia, which is the absence of sufficient oxygen in the tissues to maintain bodily functions. In my perspective “The top of the Everest” describes better the risks and rewards of