The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

Words: 580
Pages: 3

Does one know that in the U.S. overall gun are used 80% more to prevent crimes than to take lives? Guns, they are a major characteristic of America and other countries with freedoms as well, but are they worth the risk? One might believe that in order to have a prosperous country guns must only be given to the police force. The people of Germany in the 1930’s thought the exact same thing which resulted in a dictator and ultimately the holocaust which was the murder of millions. Hitler himself said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” was he right?

First of all, what is to be made of mass shootings? Before thinking guns are completely evil, one should consider that guns don’t pull the trigger, people do. So if people do, why? Well has it occurred to the common people that most mass shooting since 1950 has taken place in states with strict gun control laws? This really is a shocking fact the first time one realizes it, and would defiantly make you think twice before moving to a state with strict gun laws. Sadly people will never stop killing, and it’s not because of guns. To further prove this, in Beijing a 36 year old man injured 22 children and one adult outside an elementary school in 2012.
…show more content…
If the U.S. loses the right to bear arms, then it will most defiantly become so corrupt to a point in which it will be ruled by a dictator. The reason one could know this is that if there is an unarmed population with an already corrupt government and a single man with control of an army, stuff will go wrong. A good saying to support this is that, “The rain may pass, and it may be sunny for days. But do not make the assumption that the rain will not return.” This does not mean everyone should make tin foil hats and arm themselves with a shotgun, it is to only be taken as a