Both individuals were determined to persuade authoritative figures into realizing the unjust laws present, yet they were willing to accept the given repercussions if they are not able to do so. This is extremely evident during the multiple occurrences where King is sent to jail for his actions, and the manner that Socrates complies with his punishments. Both individual’s terms of justice and how it can be achieved are acceptable through the means they take to do so, but it raises the possible issue of a moral anarchy. A situation where all citizens oppose obeying laws set before them eradicates the possibility of an efficient government being able to prosper. Preventing this is what makes both the method and sufficient reasoning for civil disobedience so important. If neither of these aspects are appropriate, civil disobedience can possibly cause more problems than it is intended to