My concern about his argument is that he is not convincing enough for the court to turn to his side. In the court case tinker v. Des Moines two main people argued, Brown and Fortas. Brow believes that the student were in the wrong by wearing the armbands to school. On the contrary, Fortas believes that the students did nothing wrong by wearing the armbands. Brown believes that the student should be able to practice the first amendment but thinks that there should be places where the first amendments were not to be in place. For example brown wrote in his letter, “The Court decides that the public schools are an appropriate place to exercise "symbolic speech" as long as normal school functions are not "unreasonably" disrupted” In this quote Brown is saying that he believes that the first amendment should only be practiced in the appropriate places, and specifically Brown is saying that the only way that people should be able to practice the first amendment at school is f it is not to be disruptive. Brown thinks that wearing